File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Investors’ Perspective on Intellectual Property Financing

TitleInvestors’ Perspective on Intellectual Property Financing
Authors
Issue Date28-Nov-2023
PublisherSeton Hall University School of Law
Citation
Seton Hall Law Review, 2023, v. 54, n. 2, p. 439-503 How to Cite?
Abstract

The intellectual property system is generally considered to be a legal system that promotes innovation. But the ways through which it achieves this goal are still not entirely clear. Conventional intellectual property theories tend to describe the system’s role in promoting innovation as providing creators with incentives to create and commercialize intellectual products, as well as disseminating knowledge to potential users. What is lacking in the literature is theoretical research that explains the role of the intellectual property system in encouraging investors to finance innovations.

To fill this gap, this Article approaches the intellectual property system from the perspective of investors and examines its role in facilitating investors to finance innovative firms. This Article demonstrates that while investing in these firms, investors face the challenges of high risk of loss, information asymmetry, and inadequate channels. The intellectual property system helps investors handle these challenges by (1) securing their returns, (2) providing signals that assist in their decision-making, and (3) coordinating various parties to form relationships that facilitate investments. While the intellectual property system promotes innovation by facilitating financing, two inherent features of the system constrain its function: the uncertainty in intellectual property rights and the non-inclusiveness of disclosure.

To reduce the constraints on the financing function of the intellectual property system, this Article informs policymakers by presenting several reform options. Regarding the theoretical aspect, it proposes that scholars, policymakers, and lawyers examine the intellectual property system from the perspectives of investors or other parties who are not directly involved in the creation and use of intellectual products. These perspectives not only allow scholars, policymakers, and lawyers to reflect on, and even critique, conventional intellectual property theories but also assist them in developing a more comprehensive understanding of the intellectual property system.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/359095
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuan, Taorui-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T00:35:16Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-21T00:35:16Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-28-
dc.identifier.citationSeton Hall Law Review, 2023, v. 54, n. 2, p. 439-503-
dc.identifier.issn0742-6127-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/359095-
dc.description.abstract<p>The intellectual property system is generally considered to be a legal system that promotes innovation. But the ways through which it achieves this goal are still not entirely clear. Conventional intellectual property theories tend to describe the system’s role in promoting innovation as providing creators with incentives to create and commercialize intellectual products, as well as disseminating knowledge to potential users. What is lacking in the literature is theoretical research that explains the role of the intellectual property system in encouraging investors to finance innovations.</p><p>To fill this gap, this Article approaches the intellectual property system from the perspective of investors and examines its role in facilitating investors to finance innovative firms. This Article demonstrates that while investing in these firms, investors face the challenges of high risk of loss, information asymmetry, and inadequate channels. The intellectual property system helps investors handle these challenges by (1) securing their returns, (2) providing signals that assist in their decision-making, and (3) coordinating various parties to form relationships that facilitate investments. While the intellectual property system promotes innovation by facilitating financing, two inherent features of the system constrain its function: the uncertainty in intellectual property rights and the non-inclusiveness of disclosure.</p><p>To reduce the constraints on the financing function of the intellectual property system, this Article informs policymakers by presenting several reform options. Regarding the theoretical aspect, it proposes that scholars, policymakers, and lawyers examine the intellectual property system from the perspectives of investors or other parties who are not directly involved in the creation and use of intellectual products. These perspectives not only allow scholars, policymakers, and lawyers to reflect on, and even critique, conventional intellectual property theories but also assist them in developing a more comprehensive understanding of the intellectual property system.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSeton Hall University School of Law-
dc.relation.ispartofSeton Hall Law Review-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleInvestors’ Perspective on Intellectual Property Financing-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.60095/ELXR4695-
dc.identifier.volume54-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage439-
dc.identifier.epage503-
dc.identifier.eissn0742-6127-
dc.identifier.issnl0742-6127-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats