File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Phase field modeling of dendrite growth mechanism of Mg and Li in electrodeposition

TitlePhase field modeling of dendrite growth mechanism of Mg and Li in electrodeposition
Authors
KeywordsDendrite
Electrodeposition
Lithium-ion battery
Magnesium-ion battery
Phase field model
Issue Date2024
Citation
Journal of Power Sources, 2024, v. 597, article no. 234162 How to Cite?
AbstractDendrite growth causing short circuits is a long-standing challenge in the battery field. Lithium-ion batteries are always prone to form dendrite, while magnesium-ion batteries are not. In this paper, an advanced phase field model is formulated to investigate the detailed patterns and growth differences between the lithium and magnesium deposition process. The simulation results show that the deposition growth of ion is relative to the deposition time. Furthermore, the deposition growth morphology of Li is the irregular tree-like pattern, while the deposition pattern of Mg is denser and smoother. According to our phase field model results, the contribution of a smaller electric field and driving force are important factors to make Mg form a dense deposition layer rather than a tree-like dendritic morphology, which Li prefers to form. For the dendrite growth of Li, a larger electric field and driving force at the dendrite tip lead to a stronger concentration of ion and more rapid dendrite growth. And the “entrainment” phenomenon of ion leading to positive feedback further accelerates the deposition of Li ion at the dendrite tip. Furthermore, the simulation results exhibit that the overpotential required to stimulate the rapid growth of magnesium dendrites is typically smaller than that of lithium.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/360290
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.857

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXiong, Yu-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Boxun-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Qing-
dc.contributor.authorZhi, Chunyi-
dc.contributor.authorFan, Jun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T09:06:06Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-10T09:06:06Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Power Sources, 2024, v. 597, article no. 234162-
dc.identifier.issn0378-7753-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/360290-
dc.description.abstractDendrite growth causing short circuits is a long-standing challenge in the battery field. Lithium-ion batteries are always prone to form dendrite, while magnesium-ion batteries are not. In this paper, an advanced phase field model is formulated to investigate the detailed patterns and growth differences between the lithium and magnesium deposition process. The simulation results show that the deposition growth of ion is relative to the deposition time. Furthermore, the deposition growth morphology of Li is the irregular tree-like pattern, while the deposition pattern of Mg is denser and smoother. According to our phase field model results, the contribution of a smaller electric field and driving force are important factors to make Mg form a dense deposition layer rather than a tree-like dendritic morphology, which Li prefers to form. For the dendrite growth of Li, a larger electric field and driving force at the dendrite tip lead to a stronger concentration of ion and more rapid dendrite growth. And the “entrainment” phenomenon of ion leading to positive feedback further accelerates the deposition of Li ion at the dendrite tip. Furthermore, the simulation results exhibit that the overpotential required to stimulate the rapid growth of magnesium dendrites is typically smaller than that of lithium.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Power Sources-
dc.subjectDendrite-
dc.subjectElectrodeposition-
dc.subjectLithium-ion battery-
dc.subjectMagnesium-ion battery-
dc.subjectPhase field model-
dc.titlePhase field modeling of dendrite growth mechanism of Mg and Li in electrodeposition-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234162-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85184784801-
dc.identifier.volume597-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 234162-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 234162-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats