File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Swift and optical observations of GRB 050401

TitleSwift and optical observations of GRB 050401
Authors
KeywordsGamma-rays: bursts
ISM: dust, extinction
Issue Date2006
Citation
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2006, v. 365, n. 3, p. 1031-1038 How to Cite?
AbstractWe present the results of the analysis of γ-ray and X-ray data of GRB 050401 taken with the Swift satellite, together with a series of ground-based follow-up optical observations. The Swift X-ray light curve shows a clear break at about 4900 s after the γ-ray burst (GRB). The decay indices before and after the break are consistent with a scenario of continuous injection of radiation from the 'central engine' of the GRB to the fireball. Alternatively, this behaviour could result if ejecta are released with a range of Lorentz factors, with the slower shells catching up the faster at the afterglow shock position. The two scenarios are observationally indistinguishable. The GRB 050401 afterglow is quite bright in the X-ray band, but weak in the optical, with an optical to X-ray flux ratio similar to those of 'dark bursts'. We detect a significant amount of absorption in the X-ray spectrum, with NH = (1.7 ± 0.2) × 1022cm-2 at a redshift of z = 2.9, which is typical of a dense circumburst medium. Such high column density implies an unrealistic optical extinction of 30 mag if we adopt a Galactic extinction law, which would not be consistent with the optical detection of the afterglow. This suggests that the extinction law is different from the Galactic one. © 2005 RAS.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361016
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.621

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Pasquale, Massimiliano-
dc.contributor.authorBeardmore, Andy P.-
dc.contributor.authorBarthelmy, S. D.-
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, P.-
dc.contributor.authorBurrows, D. N.-
dc.contributor.authorFink, R.-
dc.contributor.authorGehrels, N.-
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMason, K. O.-
dc.contributor.authorMcNought, R.-
dc.contributor.authorNousek, J. A.-
dc.contributor.authorPage, K. L.-
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, D. M.-
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, B. A.-
dc.contributor.authorPrice, P. A.-
dc.contributor.authorRich, J.-
dc.contributor.authorRoming, P.-
dc.contributor.authorRosen, S. R.-
dc.contributor.authorSakamoto, T.-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, B. P.-
dc.contributor.authorTueller, J.-
dc.contributor.authorWells, A. A.-
dc.contributor.authorZane, S.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, B.-
dc.contributor.authorZiaeepour, H.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:14:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:14:18Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2006, v. 365, n. 3, p. 1031-1038-
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361016-
dc.description.abstractWe present the results of the analysis of γ-ray and X-ray data of GRB 050401 taken with the Swift satellite, together with a series of ground-based follow-up optical observations. The Swift X-ray light curve shows a clear break at about 4900 s after the γ-ray burst (GRB). The decay indices before and after the break are consistent with a scenario of continuous injection of radiation from the 'central engine' of the GRB to the fireball. Alternatively, this behaviour could result if ejecta are released with a range of Lorentz factors, with the slower shells catching up the faster at the afterglow shock position. The two scenarios are observationally indistinguishable. The GRB 050401 afterglow is quite bright in the X-ray band, but weak in the optical, with an optical to X-ray flux ratio similar to those of 'dark bursts'. We detect a significant amount of absorption in the X-ray spectrum, with N<inf>H</inf> = (1.7 ± 0.2) × 10<sup>22</sup>cm<sup>-2</sup> at a redshift of z = 2.9, which is typical of a dense circumburst medium. Such high column density implies an unrealistic optical extinction of 30 mag if we adopt a Galactic extinction law, which would not be consistent with the optical detection of the afterglow. This suggests that the extinction law is different from the Galactic one. © 2005 RAS.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society-
dc.subjectGamma-rays: bursts-
dc.subjectISM: dust, extinction-
dc.titleSwift and optical observations of GRB 050401-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09787.x-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33644775125-
dc.identifier.volume365-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage1031-
dc.identifier.epage1038-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2966-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats