File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Calibration of gamma-ray burst luminosity indicators

TitleCalibration of gamma-ray burst luminosity indicators
Authors
KeywordsCosmological parameters
Cosmology: observations
Gamma-rays: bursts
Issue Date2006
Citation
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters, 2006, v. 369, n. 1, p. L37-L41 How to Cite?
AbstractSeveral gamma-ray burst (GRB) luminosity indicators have been proposed which can be generally written in the form of L̂ = c π xiai, where c is the coefficient, xi is the ith observable, and ai is its corresponding power-law index. Unlike in Type Ia supernovae, calibration of GRB luminosity indicators using a low-redshift sample is difficult. This is because the GRB rate drops rapidly at low redshifts, and some nearby GRBs may be different from their cosmolog-ical brethren. Calibrating the standard candles using GRBs in a narrow redshift range (Az) near a fiducial redshift has been proposed recently. Here we elaborate such a possibility and propose to calibrate {ai} based on the Bayesian theory and to marginalize the c value over a reasonable range of cosmological parameters. We take our newly discovered multivariable GRB luminosity indicator, Eiso = cEa1 p ta2 b, as an example and test the validity of this approach through simulations, where Eiso is the isotropic energy of prompt gamma-rays, Ep is the spectral break energy, and tb is the temporal break time of the optical afterglow light curve. We show that while c strongly depends on the cosmological parameters, neither a1 nor a2 does as long as δz is small enough. The selection of δz for a particular GRB sample could be judged according to the size and the observational uncertainty of the sample. There is no preferable redshift to perform the calibration of the indices {ai}, while a lower redshift is preferable for c-marginalization. The best strategy would be to collect GRBs within a narrow redshift bin around a fiducial intermediate redshift (e.g. zc ~ 1 or zc ~ 2), as the observed GRB redshift distribution is found to peak around this range. Our simulation suggests that with the current observational precisions of measuring Eiso, Ep and tb, 25 GRBs within a redshift bin of δz ~ 0.30 would give fine calibration to the Liang-Zhang luminosity indicator. © 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 RAS.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361076
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.521

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Enwei-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bing-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:14:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:14:36Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters, 2006, v. 369, n. 1, p. L37-L41-
dc.identifier.issn1745-3933-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361076-
dc.description.abstractSeveral gamma-ray burst (GRB) luminosity indicators have been proposed which can be generally written in the form of L̂ = c π x<inf>i</inf><sup>a</sup><inf>i</inf>, where c is the coefficient, x<inf>i</inf> is the ith observable, and a<inf>i</inf> is its corresponding power-law index. Unlike in Type Ia supernovae, calibration of GRB luminosity indicators using a low-redshift sample is difficult. This is because the GRB rate drops rapidly at low redshifts, and some nearby GRBs may be different from their cosmolog-ical brethren. Calibrating the standard candles using GRBs in a narrow redshift range (Az) near a fiducial redshift has been proposed recently. Here we elaborate such a possibility and propose to calibrate {a<inf>i</inf>} based on the Bayesian theory and to marginalize the c value over a reasonable range of cosmological parameters. We take our newly discovered multivariable GRB luminosity indicator, E<inf>iso</inf> = cE<sup>a</sup><inf>1</inf> <inf>p</inf> t<sup>a</sup><inf>2</inf> <inf>b</inf>, as an example and test the validity of this approach through simulations, where Ei<inf>so</inf> is the isotropic energy of prompt gamma-rays, E<inf>p</inf> is the spectral break energy, and t<inf>b</inf> is the temporal break time of the optical afterglow light curve. We show that while c strongly depends on the cosmological parameters, neither a<inf>1</inf> nor a<inf>2</inf> does as long as δz is small enough. The selection of δz for a particular GRB sample could be judged according to the size and the observational uncertainty of the sample. There is no preferable redshift to perform the calibration of the indices {a<inf>i</inf>}, while a lower redshift is preferable for c-marginalization. The best strategy would be to collect GRBs within a narrow redshift bin around a fiducial intermediate redshift (e.g. z<inf>c</inf> ~ 1 or z<inf>c</inf> ~ 2), as the observed GRB redshift distribution is found to peak around this range. Our simulation suggests that with the current observational precisions of measuring E<inf>iso</inf>, E<inf>p</inf> and t<inf>b</inf>, 25 GRBs within a redshift bin of δz ~ 0.30 would give fine calibration to the Liang-Zhang luminosity indicator. © 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 RAS.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters-
dc.subjectCosmological parameters-
dc.subjectCosmology: observations-
dc.subjectGamma-rays: bursts-
dc.titleCalibration of gamma-ray burst luminosity indicators-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00169.x-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-34247467876-
dc.identifier.volume369-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spageL37-
dc.identifier.epageL41-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats