File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts as a distinct GRB population: A firmer case from multiple criteria constraints

TitleLow-luminosity gamma-ray bursts as a distinct GRB population: A firmer case from multiple criteria constraints
Authors
KeywordsGamma-ray: observations
Gamma-rays: bursts
Methods: statistical
Issue Date2009
Citation
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2009, v. 392, n. 1, p. 91-103 How to Cite?
AbstractThe intriguing observations of the Swift/Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) X-ray flash (XRF) 060218 and the BATSE-BeppoSAX gamma-ray burst GRB 980425, both with much lower luminosity and redshift compared to other observed bursts, naturally lead to the question of how these low-luminosity (LL) bursts are related to high-luminosity (HL) bursts. Incorporating the constraints from both the flux-limited samples observed with Compton Gamma-ray Observatory (CGRO)/BATSE and Swift/BAT and the redshift-known gamma-ray burst (GRB) sample, we investigate the luminosity function for both LL and HL GRBs through simulations. Our multiple criteria, including the log N - log P distributions from the flux-limited GRB sample, the redshift and luminosity distributions of the redshift-known sample and the detection ratio of HL and LL GRBs with Swift/BAT, provide a set of stringent constraints to the luminosity function. Assuming that the GRB rate follows the star formation rate (SFR), our simulations show that a simple power law (PL) or a broken power-law model of luminosity function fails to reproduce the observations and a new component is required. This component can be modelled with a broken power, which is characterized by a sharp increase in the burst number at around L < 1047 erg s-1. The lack of detection of moderate-luminosity GRBs at redshift ∼0.3 indicates that this feature is not due to the observational biases. The inferred local rate, ρ0, of LL GRBs from our model is ∼200 Gpc-3 yr-1 at ∼1047 erg s-1, much larger than that of HL GRBs. These results imply that LL GRBs could be a separate GRB population from HL GRBs. The recent discovery of a local X-ray transient 080109/SN 2008D would strengthen our conclusion if the observed non-thermal emission has a similar origin as the prompt emission of most GRBs and XRFs. © 2008 RAS.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361117
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.621

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVirgili, Francisco J.-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, En Wei-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bing-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:14:48Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:14:48Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2009, v. 392, n. 1, p. 91-103-
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361117-
dc.description.abstractThe intriguing observations of the Swift/Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) X-ray flash (XRF) 060218 and the BATSE-BeppoSAX gamma-ray burst GRB 980425, both with much lower luminosity and redshift compared to other observed bursts, naturally lead to the question of how these low-luminosity (LL) bursts are related to high-luminosity (HL) bursts. Incorporating the constraints from both the flux-limited samples observed with Compton Gamma-ray Observatory (CGRO)/BATSE and Swift/BAT and the redshift-known gamma-ray burst (GRB) sample, we investigate the luminosity function for both LL and HL GRBs through simulations. Our multiple criteria, including the log N - log P distributions from the flux-limited GRB sample, the redshift and luminosity distributions of the redshift-known sample and the detection ratio of HL and LL GRBs with Swift/BAT, provide a set of stringent constraints to the luminosity function. Assuming that the GRB rate follows the star formation rate (SFR), our simulations show that a simple power law (PL) or a broken power-law model of luminosity function fails to reproduce the observations and a new component is required. This component can be modelled with a broken power, which is characterized by a sharp increase in the burst number at around L < 10<sup>47</sup> erg s<sup>-1</sup>. The lack of detection of moderate-luminosity GRBs at redshift ∼0.3 indicates that this feature is not due to the observational biases. The inferred local rate, ρ<inf>0</inf>, of LL GRBs from our model is ∼200 Gpc<sup>-3</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> at ∼10<sup>47</sup> erg s<sup>-1</sup>, much larger than that of HL GRBs. These results imply that LL GRBs could be a separate GRB population from HL GRBs. The recent discovery of a local X-ray transient 080109/SN 2008D would strengthen our conclusion if the observed non-thermal emission has a similar origin as the prompt emission of most GRBs and XRFs. © 2008 RAS.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society-
dc.subjectGamma-ray: observations-
dc.subjectGamma-rays: bursts-
dc.subjectMethods: statistical-
dc.titleLow-luminosity gamma-ray bursts as a distinct GRB population: A firmer case from multiple criteria constraints-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14063.x-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-57849105074-
dc.identifier.volume392-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage91-
dc.identifier.epage103-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2966-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats