File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14063.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-57849105074
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts as a distinct GRB population: A firmer case from multiple criteria constraints
| Title | Low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts as a distinct GRB population: A firmer case from multiple criteria constraints |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Gamma-ray: observations Gamma-rays: bursts Methods: statistical |
| Issue Date | 2009 |
| Citation | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2009, v. 392, n. 1, p. 91-103 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | The intriguing observations of the Swift/Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) X-ray flash (XRF) 060218 and the BATSE-BeppoSAX gamma-ray burst GRB 980425, both with much lower luminosity and redshift compared to other observed bursts, naturally lead to the question of how these low-luminosity (LL) bursts are related to high-luminosity (HL) bursts. Incorporating the constraints from both the flux-limited samples observed with Compton Gamma-ray Observatory (CGRO)/BATSE and Swift/BAT and the redshift-known gamma-ray burst (GRB) sample, we investigate the luminosity function for both LL and HL GRBs through simulations. Our multiple criteria, including the log N - log P distributions from the flux-limited GRB sample, the redshift and luminosity distributions of the redshift-known sample and the detection ratio of HL and LL GRBs with Swift/BAT, provide a set of stringent constraints to the luminosity function. Assuming that the GRB rate follows the star formation rate (SFR), our simulations show that a simple power law (PL) or a broken power-law model of luminosity function fails to reproduce the observations and a new component is required. This component can be modelled with a broken power, which is characterized by a sharp increase in the burst number at around L < 1047 erg s-1. The lack of detection of moderate-luminosity GRBs at redshift ∼0.3 indicates that this feature is not due to the observational biases. The inferred local rate, ρ |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361117 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.621 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Virgili, Francisco J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Liang, En Wei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Bing | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:14:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:14:48Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2009, v. 392, n. 1, p. 91-103 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0035-8711 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361117 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The intriguing observations of the Swift/Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) X-ray flash (XRF) 060218 and the BATSE-BeppoSAX gamma-ray burst GRB 980425, both with much lower luminosity and redshift compared to other observed bursts, naturally lead to the question of how these low-luminosity (LL) bursts are related to high-luminosity (HL) bursts. Incorporating the constraints from both the flux-limited samples observed with Compton Gamma-ray Observatory (CGRO)/BATSE and Swift/BAT and the redshift-known gamma-ray burst (GRB) sample, we investigate the luminosity function for both LL and HL GRBs through simulations. Our multiple criteria, including the log N - log P distributions from the flux-limited GRB sample, the redshift and luminosity distributions of the redshift-known sample and the detection ratio of HL and LL GRBs with Swift/BAT, provide a set of stringent constraints to the luminosity function. Assuming that the GRB rate follows the star formation rate (SFR), our simulations show that a simple power law (PL) or a broken power-law model of luminosity function fails to reproduce the observations and a new component is required. This component can be modelled with a broken power, which is characterized by a sharp increase in the burst number at around L < 10<sup>47</sup> erg s<sup>-1</sup>. The lack of detection of moderate-luminosity GRBs at redshift ∼0.3 indicates that this feature is not due to the observational biases. The inferred local rate, ρ<inf>0</inf>, of LL GRBs from our model is ∼200 Gpc<sup>-3</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> at ∼10<sup>47</sup> erg s<sup>-1</sup>, much larger than that of HL GRBs. These results imply that LL GRBs could be a separate GRB population from HL GRBs. The recent discovery of a local X-ray transient 080109/SN 2008D would strengthen our conclusion if the observed non-thermal emission has a similar origin as the prompt emission of most GRBs and XRFs. © 2008 RAS. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | - |
| dc.subject | Gamma-ray: observations | - |
| dc.subject | Gamma-rays: bursts | - |
| dc.subject | Methods: statistical | - |
| dc.title | Low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts as a distinct GRB population: A firmer case from multiple criteria constraints | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14063.x | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-57849105074 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 392 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 91 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 103 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1365-2966 | - |
