File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1086/311945
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85034977773
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Is coherence essential to account for pulsar radio emission?
| Title | Is coherence essential to account for pulsar radio emission? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Pulsars: General Radiation mechanisms: nonthermal |
| Issue Date | 1999 |
| Citation | Astrophysical Journal Letters, 1999, v. 514, n. 2, p. L111-L114 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Based on definitions, two joint criteria, namely the optically thin constraint and the energy budget constraint, are proposed to judge whether the emission nature of radio pulsars is incoherent or obliged to be coherent. We find that the widely accepted criterion, kTB η, is not a rational criterion to describe the optically thin condition, even for the simplest case. The energy budget constraint could be released by introducing a certain efficient radiation mechanism (e.g., the inverse Compton scattering) with emission power of a single particle as high as a critical value P ∼ 10-4 to 10-3 ergs s-1. This in principle poses the possibility of interpreting high luminosities sing, c of pulsars in terms of incoherent emission mechanisms, if the optically thin constraint could be released by certain mechanisms as well. Coherence may not be an essential condition to account for pulsar radio emission. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361406 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.766 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Bing | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hong, B. H. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Qiao, G. J. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:16:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:16:44Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1999 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Astrophysical Journal Letters, 1999, v. 514, n. 2, p. L111-L114 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2041-8205 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361406 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Based on definitions, two joint criteria, namely the optically thin constraint and the energy budget constraint, are proposed to judge whether the emission nature of radio pulsars is incoherent or obliged to be coherent. We find that the widely accepted criterion, kTB η, is not a rational criterion to describe the optically thin condition, even for the simplest case. The energy budget constraint could be released by introducing a certain efficient radiation mechanism (e.g., the inverse Compton scattering) with emission power of a single particle as high as a critical value P ∼ 10<sup>-4</sup> to 10<sup>-3</sup> ergs s<sup>-1</sup>. This in principle poses the possibility of interpreting high luminosities sing, c of pulsars in terms of incoherent emission mechanisms, if the optically thin constraint could be released by certain mechanisms as well. Coherence may not be an essential condition to account for pulsar radio emission. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Astrophysical Journal Letters | - |
| dc.subject | Pulsars: General | - |
| dc.subject | Radiation mechanisms: nonthermal | - |
| dc.title | Is coherence essential to account for pulsar radio emission? | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/311945 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85034977773 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 514 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | L111 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | L114 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2041-8213 | - |
