File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Is coherence essential to account for pulsar radio emission?

TitleIs coherence essential to account for pulsar radio emission?
Authors
KeywordsPulsars: General
Radiation mechanisms: nonthermal
Issue Date1999
Citation
Astrophysical Journal Letters, 1999, v. 514, n. 2, p. L111-L114 How to Cite?
AbstractBased on definitions, two joint criteria, namely the optically thin constraint and the energy budget constraint, are proposed to judge whether the emission nature of radio pulsars is incoherent or obliged to be coherent. We find that the widely accepted criterion, kTB η, is not a rational criterion to describe the optically thin condition, even for the simplest case. The energy budget constraint could be released by introducing a certain efficient radiation mechanism (e.g., the inverse Compton scattering) with emission power of a single particle as high as a critical value P ∼ 10-4 to 10-3 ergs s-1. This in principle poses the possibility of interpreting high luminosities sing, c of pulsars in terms of incoherent emission mechanisms, if the optically thin constraint could be released by certain mechanisms as well. Coherence may not be an essential condition to account for pulsar radio emission.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361406
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.766

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bing-
dc.contributor.authorHong, B. H.-
dc.contributor.authorQiao, G. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-16T04:16:44Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-16T04:16:44Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationAstrophysical Journal Letters, 1999, v. 514, n. 2, p. L111-L114-
dc.identifier.issn2041-8205-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361406-
dc.description.abstractBased on definitions, two joint criteria, namely the optically thin constraint and the energy budget constraint, are proposed to judge whether the emission nature of radio pulsars is incoherent or obliged to be coherent. We find that the widely accepted criterion, kTB η, is not a rational criterion to describe the optically thin condition, even for the simplest case. The energy budget constraint could be released by introducing a certain efficient radiation mechanism (e.g., the inverse Compton scattering) with emission power of a single particle as high as a critical value P ∼ 10<sup>-4</sup> to 10<sup>-3</sup> ergs s<sup>-1</sup>. This in principle poses the possibility of interpreting high luminosities sing, c of pulsars in terms of incoherent emission mechanisms, if the optically thin constraint could be released by certain mechanisms as well. Coherence may not be an essential condition to account for pulsar radio emission.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAstrophysical Journal Letters-
dc.subjectPulsars: General-
dc.subjectRadiation mechanisms: nonthermal-
dc.titleIs coherence essential to account for pulsar radio emission?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/311945-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85034977773-
dc.identifier.volume514-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spageL111-
dc.identifier.epageL114-
dc.identifier.eissn2041-8213-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats