File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Validating interRAI Chinese self-reported carer needs (SCaN) assessment and predicting caregiving distress among informal Chinese caregivers of older adults

TitleValidating interRAI Chinese self-reported carer needs (SCaN) assessment and predicting caregiving distress among informal Chinese caregivers of older adults
Authors
Issue Date8-May-2024
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
BMC Geriatrics, 2024, v. 24, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Abstract Background This study aims to (1) determine the reliability and validity of the interRAI Chinese Self-reported Carer Needs (SCaN) assessment among informal Chinese caregivers of older adults, (2) identify predictors of caregiving distress in Asian regions with long-standing Confucian values of filial piety and family responsibility. Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 531 informal Chinese caregivers of older adults in Hong Kong, Shanghai, Taiwan, and Singapore. The scale reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alphas (α) and McDonald’s omega coefficient (ω). The concurrent validity and discriminant validity were assessed using Spearman rank correlations (rho). To examine the predictors of caregiving distress among informal caregivers of older adults, we employed hierarchical linear regression analyses informed by the Model of Carer Stress and Burden and categorized the predictors into six domains. Results Results revealed good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.83–0.96) and concurrent validity (rho = 0.45 0.74) of the interRAI Chinese SCaN assessment. Hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that entering the background factors, primary stressors, secondary stressors, appraisal, and exacerbating factors all significantly enhanced the model’s predictability, indicating that the source of caregiving distress is multidimensional. In the full model, caregivers with longer informal care time, lack of support from family and friends, have unmet needs, experience role overload, have sleep problems, and low IADL functioning are at a higher risk of caregiving distress. Conclusions The interRAI Chinese SCaN Assessment was found to be a reliable and valid tool among the Chinese informal caregivers of older adults. It would be useful for determining family caregivers’ strengths, needs, and challenges, and tailoring interventions that address the potentially modifiable factors associated with caregiving distress and maximize support. Healthcare providers working in home and community settings should be aware of the early identification of caregiving distress and routine assessment of their needs and empower them to continue taking care of their needs and providing adequate care to the care recipient


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361956
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.203

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXu, Shicheng-
dc.contributor.authorLou, W. Q. Vivian-
dc.contributor.authorChi, Iris-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Wai Chong-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Lung-Kuan-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Carol Hok Ka-
dc.contributor.authorJagasia, Moana-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-18T00:35:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-18T00:35:47Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-08-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Geriatrics, 2024, v. 24, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/361956-
dc.description.abstract<p>Abstract Background This study aims to (1) determine the reliability and validity of the interRAI Chinese Self-reported Carer Needs (SCaN) assessment among informal Chinese caregivers of older adults, (2) identify predictors of caregiving distress in Asian regions with long-standing Confucian values of filial piety and family responsibility. Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 531 informal Chinese caregivers of older adults in Hong Kong, Shanghai, Taiwan, and Singapore. The scale reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alphas (α) and McDonald’s omega coefficient (ω). The concurrent validity and discriminant validity were assessed using Spearman rank correlations (rho). To examine the predictors of caregiving distress among informal caregivers of older adults, we employed hierarchical linear regression analyses informed by the Model of Carer Stress and Burden and categorized the predictors into six domains. Results Results revealed good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.83–0.96) and concurrent validity (rho = 0.45 0.74) of the interRAI Chinese SCaN assessment. Hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that entering the background factors, primary stressors, secondary stressors, appraisal, and exacerbating factors all significantly enhanced the model’s predictability, indicating that the source of caregiving distress is multidimensional. In the full model, caregivers with longer informal care time, lack of support from family and friends, have unmet needs, experience role overload, have sleep problems, and low IADL functioning are at a higher risk of caregiving distress. Conclusions The interRAI Chinese SCaN Assessment was found to be a reliable and valid tool among the Chinese informal caregivers of older adults. It would be useful for determining family caregivers’ strengths, needs, and challenges, and tailoring interventions that address the potentially modifiable factors associated with caregiving distress and maximize support. Healthcare providers working in home and community settings should be aware of the early identification of caregiving distress and routine assessment of their needs and empower them to continue taking care of their needs and providing adequate care to the care recipient<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Geriatrics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleValidating interRAI Chinese self-reported carer needs (SCaN) assessment and predicting caregiving distress among informal Chinese caregivers of older adults-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12877-024-05014-0-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2318-
dc.identifier.issnl1471-2318-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats