File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s13063-024-08184-9
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85195253355
- PMID: 38835091
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Assessing the Impact of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection in CT Angiography on Patient Diagnosis and Outcomes (IDEAL Study)—a protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial
| Title | Assessing the Impact of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection in CT Angiography on Patient Diagnosis and Outcomes (IDEAL Study)—a protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Artificial intelligence Detection Double blinded Intracranial aneurysms Outcomes Randomized controlled trial |
| Issue Date | 1-Dec-2024 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central |
| Citation | Trials, 2024, v. 25, n. 1 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model on the efficacy of intracranial aneurysm detection in CT angiography (CTA) and its influence on patients’ short-term and long-term outcomes. Methods: Study design: Prospective, multicenter, double-blinded RCT. Settings: The model was designed for the automatic detection of intracranial aneurysms from original CTA images. Participants: Adult inpatients and outpatients who are scheduled for head CTA scanning. Randomization groups: (1) Experimental Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the True-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (True-AI arm). (2) Control Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the Sham-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (Sham-AI arm). Randomization: Block randomization, stratified by center, gender, and age group. Primary outcomes: Coprimary outcomes of superiority in patient-level sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity for the True-AI arm to the Sham-AI arm in intracranial aneurysms. Secondary outcomes: Diagnostic performance for other intracranial lesions, detection rates, workload of CTA interpretation, resource utilization, treatment-related clinical events, aneurysm-related events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Blinding: Study participants and participating radiologists will be blinded to the intervention. Sample size: Based on our pilot study, the patient-level sensitivity is assumed to be 0.65 for the Sham-AI arm and 0.75 for the True-AI arm, with specificities of 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms for patients undergoing head CTA in the hospital is approximately 12%. To establish superiority in sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity with a margin of 5% using a one-sided α = 0.025 to ensure that the power of coprimary endpoint testing reached 0.80 and a 5% attrition rate, the sample size was determined to be 6450 in a 1:1 allocation to True-AI or Sham-AI arm. Discussion: The study will determine the precise impact of the AI system on the detection performance for intracranial aneurysms in a double-blinded design and following the real-world effects on patients’ short-term and long-term outcomes. Trial registration: This trial has been registered with the NIH, U.S. National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06118840. Registered 11 November 2023. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362416 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.812 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Shi, Zhao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hu, Bin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lu, Mengjie | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Zijian | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Manting | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu, Yizhou | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Changsheng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhong, Jian | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wu, Bingqian | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Xueming | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei, Yongyue | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Long Jiang | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-24T00:51:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-24T00:51:22Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-12-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Trials, 2024, v. 25, n. 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1745-6215 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362416 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model on the efficacy of intracranial aneurysm detection in CT angiography (CTA) and its influence on patients’ short-term and long-term outcomes. Methods: Study design: Prospective, multicenter, double-blinded RCT. Settings: The model was designed for the automatic detection of intracranial aneurysms from original CTA images. Participants: Adult inpatients and outpatients who are scheduled for head CTA scanning. Randomization groups: (1) Experimental Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the True-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (True-AI arm). (2) Control Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the Sham-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (Sham-AI arm). Randomization: Block randomization, stratified by center, gender, and age group. Primary outcomes: Coprimary outcomes of superiority in patient-level sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity for the True-AI arm to the Sham-AI arm in intracranial aneurysms. Secondary outcomes: Diagnostic performance for other intracranial lesions, detection rates, workload of CTA interpretation, resource utilization, treatment-related clinical events, aneurysm-related events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Blinding: Study participants and participating radiologists will be blinded to the intervention. Sample size: Based on our pilot study, the patient-level sensitivity is assumed to be 0.65 for the Sham-AI arm and 0.75 for the True-AI arm, with specificities of 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms for patients undergoing head CTA in the hospital is approximately 12%. To establish superiority in sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity with a margin of 5% using a one-sided α = 0.025 to ensure that the power of coprimary endpoint testing reached 0.80 and a 5% attrition rate, the sample size was determined to be 6450 in a 1:1 allocation to True-AI or Sham-AI arm. Discussion: The study will determine the precise impact of the AI system on the detection performance for intracranial aneurysms in a double-blinded design and following the real-world effects on patients’ short-term and long-term outcomes. Trial registration: This trial has been registered with the NIH, U.S. National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06118840. Registered 11 November 2023. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Trials | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Artificial intelligence | - |
| dc.subject | Detection | - |
| dc.subject | Double blinded | - |
| dc.subject | Intracranial aneurysms | - |
| dc.subject | Outcomes | - |
| dc.subject | Randomized controlled trial | - |
| dc.title | Assessing the Impact of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection in CT Angiography on Patient Diagnosis and Outcomes (IDEAL Study)—a protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s13063-024-08184-9 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 38835091 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85195253355 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 25 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1745-6215 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1745-6215 | - |
