File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: “All you need is compassion?” a latent profile analysis of neglect and self-compassion on child mental health

Title“All you need is compassion?” a latent profile analysis of neglect and self-compassion on child mental health
Authors
KeywordsChild neglect
Latent profile analysis
Mental health
Self-compassion
Issue Date1-Oct-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Affective Disorders, 2024, v. 362, p. 799-807 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Neglect is a common form of child maltreatment and profoundly affects children's mental health globally. Self-compassion may help children cope with neglect but the role of self-compassion in neglect context has been understudied. This study identifies distinct patterns of self-compassion and child neglect and explores how neglect and self-compassion profiles correlate with child mental health. Methods: The sample includes 3342 children aged 8–16 (49.6 % female) from a national survey of 29 provinces in China using a multistage sampling method. We used latent profile analysis to identify distinct profiles of self-compassion and neglect and examine their combined effects on child mental health, including both positive indicators (hope, resilience) and negative indicators (anxiety, depression, academic burnout, and peer problems). Results: We identified four neglect/self-compassion profiles: Adaptable Self-Carers (average neglect/high self-compassion), Vulnerable Languishers (high neglect/low self-compassion), Stable Self-Soothers (low neglect/average self-compassion), and Opportune Thrivers (low neglect/high self-compassion). The Vulnerable Languishers group exhibited the poorest mental health outcomes, whereas the Opportune Thrivers showed the best outcomes. Adaptable Self-Carers, although experiencing more neglect than Stable Self-Soothers, had better mental health than the latter, possibly due to their greater self-compassion. Limitations: The cross-sectional design limits our ability to determine causality, and the use of self-reported measures increases response bias risk. Conclusions: More self-compassion and less neglect are associated with more positive mental health outcomes. Moreover, self-compassion is a potential protective factor against the adverse effects of neglect on child mental health. Fostering self-compassion may boost positive adjustment in children who have experienced neglect.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362547
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.082

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDai, Xiaolu-
dc.contributor.authorLu, Shuang-
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Andrew Alfred-
dc.contributor.authorHu, Hongwei-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-26T00:36:04Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-26T00:36:04Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Affective Disorders, 2024, v. 362, p. 799-807-
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362547-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Neglect is a common form of child maltreatment and profoundly affects children's mental health globally. Self-compassion may help children cope with neglect but the role of self-compassion in neglect context has been understudied. This study identifies distinct patterns of self-compassion and child neglect and explores how neglect and self-compassion profiles correlate with child mental health. Methods: The sample includes 3342 children aged 8–16 (49.6 % female) from a national survey of 29 provinces in China using a multistage sampling method. We used latent profile analysis to identify distinct profiles of self-compassion and neglect and examine their combined effects on child mental health, including both positive indicators (hope, resilience) and negative indicators (anxiety, depression, academic burnout, and peer problems). Results: We identified four neglect/self-compassion profiles: Adaptable Self-Carers (average neglect/high self-compassion), Vulnerable Languishers (high neglect/low self-compassion), Stable Self-Soothers (low neglect/average self-compassion), and Opportune Thrivers (low neglect/high self-compassion). The Vulnerable Languishers group exhibited the poorest mental health outcomes, whereas the Opportune Thrivers showed the best outcomes. Adaptable Self-Carers, although experiencing more neglect than Stable Self-Soothers, had better mental health than the latter, possibly due to their greater self-compassion. Limitations: The cross-sectional design limits our ability to determine causality, and the use of self-reported measures increases response bias risk. Conclusions: More self-compassion and less neglect are associated with more positive mental health outcomes. Moreover, self-compassion is a potential protective factor against the adverse effects of neglect on child mental health. Fostering self-compassion may boost positive adjustment in children who have experienced neglect.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Affective Disorders-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectChild neglect-
dc.subjectLatent profile analysis-
dc.subjectMental health-
dc.subjectSelf-compassion-
dc.title“All you need is compassion?” a latent profile analysis of neglect and self-compassion on child mental health-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.096-
dc.identifier.pmid39029682-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85199089404-
dc.identifier.volume362-
dc.identifier.spage799-
dc.identifier.epage807-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-2517-
dc.identifier.issnl0165-0327-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats