File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: The impact of vaccine type and booster dose on the magnitude and breadth of SARS-CoV-2-specific systemic and mucosal antibodies among COVID-19 vaccine recipients

TitleThe impact of vaccine type and booster dose on the magnitude and breadth of SARS-CoV-2-specific systemic and mucosal antibodies among COVID-19 vaccine recipients
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19 vaccine
IgA
Mucosal immunity
Omicron variant
Saliva
SARS-CoV-2
Issue Date15-Aug-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Heliyon, 2024, v. 10, n. 15 How to Cite?
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on global health and economy, which was significantly mitigated by the availability of COVID-19 vaccines. The levels of systemic and mucosal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 correlated with protection. However, there is limited data on how vaccine type and booster doses affect mucosal antibody response, and how the breadth of mucosal and systemic antibodies compares. In this cross-sectional study, we compared the magnitude and breadth of mucosal and systemic antibodies in 108 individuals who received either the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) or CoronaVac (SinoVac) vaccine. We found that BNT162b2 (vs CoronaVac) or booster doses (vs two doses) were significantly associated with higher serum IgG levels, but were not significantly associated with salivary IgA levels, regardless of prior infection status. Among non-infected individuals, serum IgG, serum IgA and salivary IgG levels were significantly higher against the ancestral strain than the Omicron BA.2 sublineage, but salivary IgA levels did not differ between the strains. Salivary IgA had the weakest correlation with serum IgG (r = 0.34) compared with salivary IgG (r = 0.63) and serum IgA (r = 0.60). Our findings suggest that intramuscular COVID-19 vaccines elicit a distinct mucosal IgA response that differs from the systemic IgG response. As mucosal IgA independently correlates with protection, vaccine trials should include mucosal IgA as an outcome measure.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362549

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsoi, Hoi Wah-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Miko Ka Wai-
dc.contributor.authorCai, Jian Piao-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, Rosana Wing Shan-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Brian Pui Chun-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Kwok Hung-
dc.contributor.authorTam, Anthony Raymond-
dc.contributor.authorChu, Wing Ming-
dc.contributor.authorHung, Ivan Fan Ngai-
dc.contributor.authorTo, Kelvin Kai Wang-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-26T00:36:04Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-26T00:36:04Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-15-
dc.identifier.citationHeliyon, 2024, v. 10, n. 15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362549-
dc.description.abstract<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on global health and economy, which was significantly mitigated by the availability of COVID-19 vaccines. The levels of systemic and mucosal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 correlated with protection. However, there is limited data on how vaccine type and booster doses affect mucosal antibody response, and how the breadth of mucosal and systemic antibodies compares. In this cross-sectional study, we compared the magnitude and breadth of mucosal and systemic antibodies in 108 individuals who received either the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) or CoronaVac (SinoVac) vaccine. We found that BNT162b2 (vs CoronaVac) or booster doses (vs two doses) were significantly associated with higher serum IgG levels, but were not significantly associated with salivary IgA levels, regardless of prior infection status. Among non-infected individuals, serum IgG, serum IgA and salivary IgG levels were significantly higher against the ancestral strain than the Omicron BA.2 sublineage, but salivary IgA levels did not differ between the strains. Salivary IgA had the weakest correlation with serum IgG (r = 0.34) compared with salivary IgG (r = 0.63) and serum IgA (r = 0.60). Our findings suggest that intramuscular COVID-19 vaccines elicit a distinct mucosal IgA response that differs from the systemic IgG response. As mucosal IgA independently correlates with protection, vaccine trials should include mucosal IgA as an outcome measure.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofHeliyon-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCOVID-19 vaccine-
dc.subjectIgA-
dc.subjectMucosal immunity-
dc.subjectOmicron variant-
dc.subjectSaliva-
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2-
dc.titleThe impact of vaccine type and booster dose on the magnitude and breadth of SARS-CoV-2-specific systemic and mucosal antibodies among COVID-19 vaccine recipients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35334-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85199752307-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue15-
dc.identifier.eissn2405-8440-
dc.identifier.issnl2405-8440-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats