File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Spatial allocation of bioretention cells considering interaction with shallow groundwater: A simulation-optimization approach

TitleSpatial allocation of bioretention cells considering interaction with shallow groundwater: A simulation-optimization approach
Authors
KeywordsGreen infrastructure
Groundwater modeling
Low impact development
Multi-objective optimization
Stormwater management
Urban planning
Issue Date20-Jul-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Science of the Total Environment, 2024, v. 935 How to Cite?
AbstractGreen infrastructure (GI), as one type of ecological stormwater management practices, can potentially alleviate water problems and deliver a wide range of environmental benefits in urban areas. GIs are often planned and designed to reduce runoff and mitigate pollution. However, the influence of GI on groundwater hydrology and that of shallow groundwater on GI performance was seldom considered. This study utilized a calibrated surface-subsurface hydrological model, i.e., Storm Water Management Model coupled with USGS's modular hydrologic model (SWMM-MODFLOW) to consider the interaction between GI and groundwater into the process of GI planning. The optimal implementation ratio, aggregation level and upstream-downstream location of bioretention cells (BC, one type of GI) under different planning objectives and hydrogeologic conditions was explored. The consideration of groundwater management exerted a significant impact on the optimal spatial allocation of BCs. The results showed that when groundwater management was more concerned than runoff control, BCs were recommended to be allocated more apart from each other and more upstream in the catchment because more-distributed and upstream BCs can result in lower groundwater table rise which is beneficial. BCs were overall recommended to be allocated in areas of deeper groundwater tables, coarser soils, and flatter topographies. However, the spatial features of BCs are related to each other, the choice of them are affected by various hydrogeologic factors simultaneously. The exact location of BCs should be determined by considering the trade-off between runoff control efficiency and groundwater impact. The findings obtained in this study can provide guidance on GI planning in shallow groundwater areas.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362749
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.998

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Kun-
dc.contributor.authorChui, Ting Fong May-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-30T00:35:20Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-30T00:35:20Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-20-
dc.identifier.citationScience of the Total Environment, 2024, v. 935-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362749-
dc.description.abstractGreen infrastructure (GI), as one type of ecological stormwater management practices, can potentially alleviate water problems and deliver a wide range of environmental benefits in urban areas. GIs are often planned and designed to reduce runoff and mitigate pollution. However, the influence of GI on groundwater hydrology and that of shallow groundwater on GI performance was seldom considered. This study utilized a calibrated surface-subsurface hydrological model, i.e., Storm Water Management Model coupled with USGS's modular hydrologic model (SWMM-MODFLOW) to consider the interaction between GI and groundwater into the process of GI planning. The optimal implementation ratio, aggregation level and upstream-downstream location of bioretention cells (BC, one type of GI) under different planning objectives and hydrogeologic conditions was explored. The consideration of groundwater management exerted a significant impact on the optimal spatial allocation of BCs. The results showed that when groundwater management was more concerned than runoff control, BCs were recommended to be allocated more apart from each other and more upstream in the catchment because more-distributed and upstream BCs can result in lower groundwater table rise which is beneficial. BCs were overall recommended to be allocated in areas of deeper groundwater tables, coarser soils, and flatter topographies. However, the spatial features of BCs are related to each other, the choice of them are affected by various hydrogeologic factors simultaneously. The exact location of BCs should be determined by considering the trade-off between runoff control efficiency and groundwater impact. The findings obtained in this study can provide guidance on GI planning in shallow groundwater areas.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofScience of the Total Environment-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectGreen infrastructure-
dc.subjectGroundwater modeling-
dc.subjectLow impact development-
dc.subjectMulti-objective optimization-
dc.subjectStormwater management-
dc.subjectUrban planning-
dc.titleSpatial allocation of bioretention cells considering interaction with shallow groundwater: A simulation-optimization approach-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173369-
dc.identifier.pmid38777071-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85193808292-
dc.identifier.volume935-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1026-
dc.identifier.issnl0048-9697-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats