File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Does Traditional Debt Financing Hurt the Environment? Evidence from Toxic Releases

TitleDoes Traditional Debt Financing Hurt the Environment? Evidence from Toxic Releases
Authors
KeywordsCorporate ethics
Corporate finance
Debt financing
Pollution
Toxic releases
Issue Date27-Jan-2025
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Journal of Business Ethics, 2025, v. 200, p. 957-985 How to Cite?
AbstractThe sources of financing for a firm can influence its environmental ethics. This study shows that traditional debt financing is associated with more pollution. Specifically, after issuing debt, firms tend to increase not only their total pollution level but also their pollution intensity. The debt‒pollution link cannot be fully explained by the production effect. This effect is more pronounced when the firm borrows for short-term purposes, has managerial short-termism, or has more risk-taking behavior. The environmental awareness of the public can weaken the debt effect. Our findings support the notion that traditional debt financing can exacerbate short-termism in firm operations, leading to a sacrifice of long-term investments that may yield future benefits. Our study suggests that green financing, such as green bonds or green loans, could help improve corporate ethical behavior.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362771
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.624

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLyu, Xiaoyi-
dc.contributor.authorShan, Chenyu-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Dragon Yongjun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-30T00:35:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-30T00:35:28Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-27-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business Ethics, 2025, v. 200, p. 957-985-
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362771-
dc.description.abstractThe sources of financing for a firm can influence its environmental ethics. This study shows that traditional debt financing is associated with more pollution. Specifically, after issuing debt, firms tend to increase not only their total pollution level but also their pollution intensity. The debt‒pollution link cannot be fully explained by the production effect. This effect is more pronounced when the firm borrows for short-term purposes, has managerial short-termism, or has more risk-taking behavior. The environmental awareness of the public can weaken the debt effect. Our findings support the notion that traditional debt financing can exacerbate short-termism in firm operations, leading to a sacrifice of long-term investments that may yield future benefits. Our study suggests that green financing, such as green bonds or green loans, could help improve corporate ethical behavior.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Business Ethics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCorporate ethics-
dc.subjectCorporate finance-
dc.subjectDebt financing-
dc.subjectPollution-
dc.subjectToxic releases-
dc.titleDoes Traditional Debt Financing Hurt the Environment? Evidence from Toxic Releases-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10551-024-05907-5-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85216648767-
dc.identifier.volume200-
dc.identifier.spage957-
dc.identifier.epage985-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0697-
dc.identifier.issnl0167-4544-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats