File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A worldwide look into long COVID-19 management: an END-COVID survey

TitleA worldwide look into long COVID-19 management: an END-COVID survey
Authors
Issue Date1-Nov-2024
PublisherEuropean Respiratory Society
Citation
ERJ Open Research, 2024, v. 10, n. 6 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background Long COVID is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome characterised by a variety of reported symptoms and signs. Its clinical management is expected to differ significantly worldwide. Methods A survey-based study investigating long COVID-related standard operating procedures (SOPs) has been conducted by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) END-COVID clinical research collaboration with the support of other international societies (ALAT, APSR, CHEST, ESCMID and PATS). A global analysis of the results is provided here, alongside sub-population analysis based on continents, national income levels, type of involved healthcare professional and inclusion or exclusion of paediatric patients. Findings 1015 healthcare professionals from 110 different countries worldwide participated in this study, the majority of them being respiratory physicians (60.6%). A dedicated long COVID programme was present in 55.4% of the investigated institutions, with hospital admission during the acute infection being the main inclusion criteria to access them. Consistent differences in long COVID-related procedures were identified among centres, mainly regarding the multidisciplinary approach, the availability of telemedicine and psychological support, the type of requested exams and the total amount of visits in the centre. Interpretation Long COVID management shows important differences related to geographical areas and national income levels. SOPs were significantly different when centres were managed by a pulmonologist or when paediatric patients were included.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362838
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.235

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNigro, Mattia-
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela, Claudia-
dc.contributor.authorArancibia, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorLam, David C.L.-
dc.contributor.authorMaves, Ryan C.-
dc.contributor.authorRath, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Steven Q.-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yuanlin-
dc.contributor.authorTsiodras, Sotirios-
dc.contributor.authorChalmers, James D.-
dc.contributor.authorAliberti, Stefano-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-03T00:35:29Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-03T00:35:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-11-01-
dc.identifier.citationERJ Open Research, 2024, v. 10, n. 6-
dc.identifier.issn2312-0541-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362838-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background Long COVID is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome characterised by a variety of reported symptoms and signs. Its clinical management is expected to differ significantly worldwide. Methods A survey-based study investigating long COVID-related standard operating procedures (SOPs) has been conducted by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) END-COVID clinical research collaboration with the support of other international societies (ALAT, APSR, CHEST, ESCMID and PATS). A global analysis of the results is provided here, alongside sub-population analysis based on continents, national income levels, type of involved healthcare professional and inclusion or exclusion of paediatric patients. Findings 1015 healthcare professionals from 110 different countries worldwide participated in this study, the majority of them being respiratory physicians (60.6%). A dedicated long COVID programme was present in 55.4% of the investigated institutions, with hospital admission during the acute infection being the main inclusion criteria to access them. Consistent differences in long COVID-related procedures were identified among centres, mainly regarding the multidisciplinary approach, the availability of telemedicine and psychological support, the type of requested exams and the total amount of visits in the centre. Interpretation Long COVID management shows important differences related to geographical areas and national income levels. SOPs were significantly different when centres were managed by a pulmonologist or when paediatric patients were included.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEuropean Respiratory Society-
dc.relation.ispartofERJ Open Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleA worldwide look into long COVID-19 management: an END-COVID survey -
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1183/23120541.00096-2024-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85211330317-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.eissn2312-0541-
dc.identifier.issnl2312-0541-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats