File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A translation and validation study of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED scale in Chinese Hong Kong residents

TitleA translation and validation study of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED scale in Chinese Hong Kong residents
Authors
KeywordsChinese
Questionnaire
Reliability
Sleep
Sleep health
Validity
Issue Date2025
Citation
Sleep Health, 2025, v. 11, n. 3, p. 390-398 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: The Regularity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration (RU-SATED) version 4.0 is a 6-item tool designed to evaluate sleep health. This study examined the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED (RU-SATED-TC) scale. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on December 9, 2023 for 4 weeks. Participants were recruited via a Facebook page to complete an online questionnaire assessing sleep, mental, and physical health. The RU-SATED-TC uses a 5-point Likert scale, with a total score range from 0-24. The psychometric properties of the RU-SATED-TC, including internal consistency, concurrent validity, 1-week test-retest reliability, and factor analysis, were evaluated. Results: A total of 1043 participants (67.3% female, 55.9% aged 18-39) completed the survey. The average RU-SATED-TC scale score was 12.24 (SD = 3.53). Confirmatory factor analyses showed an acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.09, and SRMR = 0.04), supporting a two-factor structure of “consistency and effectiveness” and “timing.” “Efficiency” did not load on any factors. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.608, with corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.099-0.530. The “timing” item showed the weakest item-total and concurrent correlations with other sleep outcome measures. The 1-week test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICCs ranging from 0.605-0.843), except for item 4 (efficiency), which had fair reliability (ICC = 0.464). Conclusion: The RU-SATED-TC scale appears to be a reliable valid tool for measuring sleep health in Chinese Hong Kong residents. Nevertheless, future research may be needed to refine the “timing” item.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363025

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuan, Jia Yin-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Wing Fai-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Branda Yee Man-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Ka Fai-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Fiona Yan Yee-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Heidi Ka ying-
dc.contributor.authorSu, Jingjing-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-10T07:44:07Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-10T07:44:07Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationSleep Health, 2025, v. 11, n. 3, p. 390-398-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363025-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The Regularity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration (RU-SATED) version 4.0 is a 6-item tool designed to evaluate sleep health. This study examined the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED (RU-SATED-TC) scale. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on December 9, 2023 for 4 weeks. Participants were recruited via a Facebook page to complete an online questionnaire assessing sleep, mental, and physical health. The RU-SATED-TC uses a 5-point Likert scale, with a total score range from 0-24. The psychometric properties of the RU-SATED-TC, including internal consistency, concurrent validity, 1-week test-retest reliability, and factor analysis, were evaluated. Results: A total of 1043 participants (67.3% female, 55.9% aged 18-39) completed the survey. The average RU-SATED-TC scale score was 12.24 (SD = 3.53). Confirmatory factor analyses showed an acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.09, and SRMR = 0.04), supporting a two-factor structure of “consistency and effectiveness” and “timing.” “Efficiency” did not load on any factors. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.608, with corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.099-0.530. The “timing” item showed the weakest item-total and concurrent correlations with other sleep outcome measures. The 1-week test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICCs ranging from 0.605-0.843), except for item 4 (efficiency), which had fair reliability (ICC = 0.464). Conclusion: The RU-SATED-TC scale appears to be a reliable valid tool for measuring sleep health in Chinese Hong Kong residents. Nevertheless, future research may be needed to refine the “timing” item.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSleep Health-
dc.subjectChinese-
dc.subjectQuestionnaire-
dc.subjectReliability-
dc.subjectSleep-
dc.subjectSleep health-
dc.subjectValidity-
dc.titleA translation and validation study of the traditional Chinese version of RU-SATED scale in Chinese Hong Kong residents-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.sleh.2025.03.010-
dc.identifier.pmid40335392-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105004645048-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage390-
dc.identifier.epage398-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-7218-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats