File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.03.006
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84876486836
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Small planetesimals in a massive disk formed Mars
| Title | Small planetesimals in a massive disk formed Mars |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Mars Origin, Solar System Planetary formation Planetesimals Terrestrial planets |
| Issue Date | 2013 |
| Citation | Icarus, 2013, v. 225, n. 1, p. 122-130 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Mars is likely to be a planetary embryo formed through collisions with planetesimals, which can explain its small mass and rapid formation timescale obtained from 182Hf-182W chronometry. In the classical theory of planet formation, the final embryo mass is determined only by the solid surface density. However, embryos can stir surrounding planetesimals, leading to fragmentation through erosive (cratering) collisions. We find that radial drift of small fragments can drastically reduce the solid surface density. On the other hand, embryo growth is accelerated by fragment accretion. Since collisional fragmentation efficiency depends on the initial size of planetesimals, the final embryo mass and its growth time are determined by the initial planetesimal size and disk surface density. We have investigated the effect of these two parameters on the mass of Mars and the predicted radiogenic excess of 182W in the martian mantle. Two scenarios can explain the rapid formation of small Mars: (i) it formed by accretion of small planetesimals in a massive disk or (ii) it formed from large planetesimals but its growth was arrested by the inward then outward migration of Jupiter. Taking into account all constraints, we conclude that Mars is likely to have formed in a massive disk of about ~0.1 solar mass from planetesimals smaller than ~10km in radius. Such small planetesimal size cannot explain core accretion of Jupiter, suggesting that there may have been a heliocentric gradient in planetesimal size in the solar nebula. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/363174 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.061 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kobayashi, Hiroshi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Dauphas, Nicolas | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-10T07:44:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-10T07:44:59Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Icarus, 2013, v. 225, n. 1, p. 122-130 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0019-1035 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/363174 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Mars is likely to be a planetary embryo formed through collisions with planetesimals, which can explain its small mass and rapid formation timescale obtained from <sup>182</sup>Hf-<sup>182</sup>W chronometry. In the classical theory of planet formation, the final embryo mass is determined only by the solid surface density. However, embryos can stir surrounding planetesimals, leading to fragmentation through erosive (cratering) collisions. We find that radial drift of small fragments can drastically reduce the solid surface density. On the other hand, embryo growth is accelerated by fragment accretion. Since collisional fragmentation efficiency depends on the initial size of planetesimals, the final embryo mass and its growth time are determined by the initial planetesimal size and disk surface density. We have investigated the effect of these two parameters on the mass of Mars and the predicted radiogenic excess of <sup>182</sup>W in the martian mantle. Two scenarios can explain the rapid formation of small Mars: (i) it formed by accretion of small planetesimals in a massive disk or (ii) it formed from large planetesimals but its growth was arrested by the inward then outward migration of Jupiter. Taking into account all constraints, we conclude that Mars is likely to have formed in a massive disk of about ~0.1 solar mass from planetesimals smaller than ~10km in radius. Such small planetesimal size cannot explain core accretion of Jupiter, suggesting that there may have been a heliocentric gradient in planetesimal size in the solar nebula. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Icarus | - |
| dc.subject | Mars | - |
| dc.subject | Origin, Solar System | - |
| dc.subject | Planetary formation | - |
| dc.subject | Planetesimals | - |
| dc.subject | Terrestrial planets | - |
| dc.title | Small planetesimals in a massive disk formed Mars | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.03.006 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84876486836 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 225 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 122 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 130 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1090-2643 | - |
