File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Weight reduction and cardiovascular benefits: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleWeight reduction and cardiovascular benefits: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsCardiovascular outcomes
Obesity
Systematic review
Weight loss
Issue Date2018
Citation
Medicine United States, 2018, v. 97, n. 50, article no. e13246 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: There is widespread obesity paradox in cardiovascular diseases, the cardiovascular influence from weight management remains controversial. Moreover, previous publications indicating that different weight reduction extent might lead to various results. Thus, it is of importance to reassess the cardiovascular benefits of weight management strategies. Objectives: This review is designed to assess the association between weight loss and cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: Clinical trials including randomized control trials, observational studies reported a weight change before and after weight interventions including lifestyle intervention, as well as pharmacotherapies were included. Three major databases will be searched to retrieve the appropriate studies. Dual selection and abstraction of data will be conducted by 2 authors independently. The population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, study characteristics framework will be used to extract all the necessary data from included studies. The risk of bias assessment will be conducted in duplicate based on the Cochrane risk of bias guideline for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement for observational studies respectively. The primary outcomes will be the cardiovascular mortality, and the secondary outcomes are allcause mortality and new cardiovascular events. A meta-analysis will be considered if there is sufficient homogeneity among selected studies. Follow the criteria of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), the quality of the cumulative evidence will be evaluated. Resultsandconclusions: The results of this systematic review could provide reliable and concrete evidence for weight loss and its cardiovascular benefits. Prospero registration number: CRD42018108582.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363308
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.441

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Yingke-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Branda Yee Man-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yanfei-
dc.contributor.authorTong, Tiejun-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yue-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-10T07:45:57Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-10T07:45:57Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationMedicine United States, 2018, v. 97, n. 50, article no. e13246-
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363308-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is widespread obesity paradox in cardiovascular diseases, the cardiovascular influence from weight management remains controversial. Moreover, previous publications indicating that different weight reduction extent might lead to various results. Thus, it is of importance to reassess the cardiovascular benefits of weight management strategies. Objectives: This review is designed to assess the association between weight loss and cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: Clinical trials including randomized control trials, observational studies reported a weight change before and after weight interventions including lifestyle intervention, as well as pharmacotherapies were included. Three major databases will be searched to retrieve the appropriate studies. Dual selection and abstraction of data will be conducted by 2 authors independently. The population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, study characteristics framework will be used to extract all the necessary data from included studies. The risk of bias assessment will be conducted in duplicate based on the Cochrane risk of bias guideline for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement for observational studies respectively. The primary outcomes will be the cardiovascular mortality, and the secondary outcomes are allcause mortality and new cardiovascular events. A meta-analysis will be considered if there is sufficient homogeneity among selected studies. Follow the criteria of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), the quality of the cumulative evidence will be evaluated. Resultsandconclusions: The results of this systematic review could provide reliable and concrete evidence for weight loss and its cardiovascular benefits. Prospero registration number: CRD42018108582.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine United States-
dc.subjectCardiovascular outcomes-
dc.subjectObesity-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.subjectWeight loss-
dc.titleWeight reduction and cardiovascular benefits: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000013246-
dc.identifier.pmid30557969-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85058768927-
dc.identifier.volume97-
dc.identifier.issue50-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e13246-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e13246-
dc.identifier.eissn1536-5964-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats