File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Self-Regulatory ODR in China’s e-Commerce Market
| Title | Self-Regulatory ODR in China’s e-Commerce Market |
|---|---|
| Other Titles | An Examination of Alibaba’s Taobao Platform and Crowdsourced ODR |
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 27-Feb-2025 |
| Publisher | Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London |
| Citation | Amicus Curiae, 2025, v. 6, n. 2, p. 358-403 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This article explores the evolution and application of online dispute resolution (ODR) within China’s e-commerce landscape, focusing on the self-regulatory mechanisms employed by Alibaba’s Taobao platform. It provides an overview of China’s ODR development, analyses Taobao’s crowdsourced jury system as a case study, and examines the platform’s rulemaking and dispute resolution procedures. The analysis highlights Taobao’s ability to resolve disputes efficiently while addressing important challenges, such as transparency, data privacy and legal accountability. The study emphasizes Taobao’s role in shaping China’s e-commerce governance, underlining the need for balance between innovation and consumer trust in a rapidly expanding digital marketplace. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/363887 |
| ISSN |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lin, Yang | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-15T00:35:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-15T00:35:27Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-02-27 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Amicus Curiae, 2025, v. 6, n. 2, p. 358-403 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1461-2097 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/363887 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>This article explores the evolution and application of online dispute resolution (ODR) within China’s e-commerce landscape, focusing on the self-regulatory mechanisms employed by Alibaba’s Taobao platform. It provides an overview of China’s ODR development, analyses Taobao’s crowdsourced jury system as a case study, and examines the platform’s rulemaking and dispute resolution procedures. The analysis highlights Taobao’s ability to resolve disputes efficiently while addressing important challenges, such as transparency, data privacy and legal accountability. The study emphasizes Taobao’s role in shaping China’s e-commerce governance, underlining the need for balance between innovation and consumer trust in a rapidly expanding digital marketplace.<br></p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Amicus Curiae | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.title | Self-Regulatory ODR in China’s e-Commerce Market | - |
| dc.title.alternative | An Examination of Alibaba’s Taobao Platform and Crowdsourced ODR | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.14296/ac.v6i2.5755 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 6 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 358 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 403 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1461-2097 | - |