File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Optimizing 5-aminosalicylate for moderate ulcerative colitis: expert recommendations from the Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition

TitleOptimizing 5-aminosalicylate for moderate ulcerative colitis: expert recommendations from the Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition
Authors
Keywords5-Aminosalicylates
Inflammatory bowel diseases
Treatment optimization
Ulcerative colitis
Issue Date1-Jan-2025
PublisherKorean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KAMJE)
Citation
Intestinal Research, 2025, v. 23, n. 1, p. 37-55 How to Cite?
AbstractThe lack of clear definition and classification for “moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)” creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364104
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.993

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkyüz, Filiz-
dc.contributor.authorAn, Yoon Kyo-
dc.contributor.authorBegun, Jakob-
dc.contributor.authorAniwan, Satimai-
dc.contributor.authorBui, Huu Hoang-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Webber-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Chang Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorChopdat, Nazeer-
dc.contributor.authorConnor, Susan J.-
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Devendra-
dc.contributor.authorFlanagan, Emma-
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, Taku-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Allen Yu Hung-
dc.contributor.authorLeong, Rupert W.-
dc.contributor.authorLeow, Alex Hwong Ruey-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Wai Keung-
dc.contributor.authorLimsrivilai, Julajak-
dc.contributor.authorMuzellina, Virly Nanda-
dc.contributor.authorPeddi, Kiran-
dc.contributor.authorRan, Zhihua-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Shu Chen-
dc.contributor.authorSollano, Jose-
dc.contributor.authorTeo, Michelle Mui Hian-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Kaichun-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Byong Duk-
dc.contributor.authorOoi, Choon Jin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-22T00:35:32Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-22T00:35:32Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationIntestinal Research, 2025, v. 23, n. 1, p. 37-55-
dc.identifier.issn1598-9100-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364104-
dc.description.abstractThe lack of clear definition and classification for “moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)” creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherKorean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KAMJE)-
dc.relation.ispartofIntestinal Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subject5-Aminosalicylates-
dc.subjectInflammatory bowel diseases-
dc.subjectTreatment optimization-
dc.subjectUlcerative colitis-
dc.titleOptimizing 5-aminosalicylate for moderate ulcerative colitis: expert recommendations from the Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.5217/ir.2024.00089-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85217886384-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage37-
dc.identifier.epage55-
dc.identifier.eissn2288-1956-
dc.identifier.issnl1598-9100-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats