File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The impact of lowering the study design significance threshold to 0.005 on sample size in randomized cancer clinical trials

TitleThe impact of lowering the study design significance threshold to 0.005 on sample size in randomized cancer clinical trials
Authors
Keywordsclinical trial
P-value
sample size
threshold
trial design
Issue Date18-Dec-2024
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 2024, v. 8, n. 1 How to Cite?
AbstractThe proposal of improving reproducibility by lowering the significance threshold to 0.005 has been discussed, but the impact on conducting clinical trials has yet to be examined from a study design perspective. The impact on sample size and study duration was investigated using design setups from 125 phase II studies published between 2015 and 2022. The impact was assessed using percent increase in sample size and additional years of accrual with the medians being 110.97% higher and 2.65 years longer respectively. The results indicated that this proposal causes additional financial burdens that reduce the efficiency of conducting clinical trials.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364183

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Tiffany H.-
dc.contributor.authorHo, James C.-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaofei-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Wendy W.-
dc.contributor.authorPang, Herbert H.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-25T00:35:20Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-25T00:35:20Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-18-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical and Translational Science, 2024, v. 8, n. 1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364183-
dc.description.abstractThe proposal of improving reproducibility by lowering the significance threshold to 0.005 has been discussed, but the impact on conducting clinical trials has yet to be examined from a study design perspective. The impact on sample size and study duration was investigated using design setups from 125 phase II studies published between 2015 and 2022. The impact was assessed using percent increase in sample size and additional years of accrual with the medians being 110.97% higher and 2.65 years longer respectively. The results indicated that this proposal causes additional financial burdens that reduce the efficiency of conducting clinical trials.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Translational Science-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectclinical trial-
dc.subjectP-value-
dc.subjectsample size-
dc.subjectthreshold-
dc.subjecttrial design-
dc.titleThe impact of lowering the study design significance threshold to 0.005 on sample size in randomized cancer clinical trials-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/cts.2023.699-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85180468178-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn2059-8661-
dc.identifier.issnl2059-8661-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats