File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Implementation and validation of a novel clinical bedside tool (Time-Up and Flex) in rehabilitation for geriatric hip fracture patients post hip fracture surgery

TitleImplementation and validation of a novel clinical bedside tool (Time-Up and Flex) in rehabilitation for geriatric hip fracture patients post hip fracture surgery
Authors
KeywordsFragility
Geriatrics
Hip fracture
Rehabilitation
Trauma
Issue Date1-Jun-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Injury, 2025, v. 56, n. 6 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: Fragility fractures in the elderly population is increasing due to the global aging population. Rehabilitation following hip fracture surgery plays a crucial role in restoring functional independence and quality of life. There are currently limited bedside rehabilitation tool for geriatric hip fracture patients. A novel tool (Time-Up and Flex [TUF]) was designed with the aim to allow patients perform bedside rehab exercises, provide objective feedback and enhance recovery. Design: A single centre, double-blinded, prospective validation study. A 3D printed TUF tool measures time taken to actively flex the operated hip to 30° on post-operative days [POD] 1, 7 and 14. The time is compared against subjective (Numerical Patient Reported Pain Scale [NPRS]) and objective outcomes (Tinetti Scale [TS], Functional Ambulation Category [FAC]). Assessors of the TUF score are blinded to the assessors of patient report outcome measures. Results: Mean time for TUF were 12.7 s (seconds), 9.5 s and 6.7 s, NPRS were 7.3, 4.8, 3.2, TS were 9.8, 14.1, 18.6, FAC were 1.2, 2.0, 3.1 on POD1, 7 and 14 respectively. Coefficient of correlation for TUF time against NPRS was 0.729 (p < 0.05), TUF time against TS was -0.721 (p < 0.05), TUF time against FAC -0.688 (p < 0.05). A decrease in TUF time correlated to a statistically significant decrease in NPRS, increase in TS and FAC. The calculated Cohen's D and Cronbach Alpha for TUF tool supported its ability to produce consistent and valid results. Conclusion: TUF tool is valid and correlates with patient's subjective and objective outcomes. It has a good predictor value for the patient's pain, mobility and future falls risk. TUF tool has potential to be incorporated into geriatric hip fracture rehabilitation pathway in the future.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364190
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.728

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTam, Johnson Pok Him-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Timmy Chi Wing-
dc.contributor.authorYung, Colin Shing Yat-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Tak Wing-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Frankie-
dc.contributor.authorFang, Christian-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-25T00:35:23Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-25T00:35:23Z-
dc.date.issued2025-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationInjury, 2025, v. 56, n. 6-
dc.identifier.issn0020-1383-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364190-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Fragility fractures in the elderly population is increasing due to the global aging population. Rehabilitation following hip fracture surgery plays a crucial role in restoring functional independence and quality of life. There are currently limited bedside rehabilitation tool for geriatric hip fracture patients. A novel tool (Time-Up and Flex [TUF]) was designed with the aim to allow patients perform bedside rehab exercises, provide objective feedback and enhance recovery. Design: A single centre, double-blinded, prospective validation study. A 3D printed TUF tool measures time taken to actively flex the operated hip to 30° on post-operative days [POD] 1, 7 and 14. The time is compared against subjective (Numerical Patient Reported Pain Scale [NPRS]) and objective outcomes (Tinetti Scale [TS], Functional Ambulation Category [FAC]). Assessors of the TUF score are blinded to the assessors of patient report outcome measures. Results: Mean time for TUF were 12.7 s (seconds), 9.5 s and 6.7 s, NPRS were 7.3, 4.8, 3.2, TS were 9.8, 14.1, 18.6, FAC were 1.2, 2.0, 3.1 on POD1, 7 and 14 respectively. Coefficient of correlation for TUF time against NPRS was 0.729 (p < 0.05), TUF time against TS was -0.721 (p < 0.05), TUF time against FAC -0.688 (p < 0.05). A decrease in TUF time correlated to a statistically significant decrease in NPRS, increase in TS and FAC. The calculated Cohen's D and Cronbach Alpha for TUF tool supported its ability to produce consistent and valid results. Conclusion: TUF tool is valid and correlates with patient's subjective and objective outcomes. It has a good predictor value for the patient's pain, mobility and future falls risk. TUF tool has potential to be incorporated into geriatric hip fracture rehabilitation pathway in the future.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofInjury-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectFragility-
dc.subjectGeriatrics-
dc.subjectHip fracture-
dc.subjectRehabilitation-
dc.subjectTrauma-
dc.titleImplementation and validation of a novel clinical bedside tool (Time-Up and Flex) in rehabilitation for geriatric hip fracture patients post hip fracture surgery-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2025.112282-
dc.identifier.pmid40163957-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105001101611-
dc.identifier.volume56-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0267-
dc.identifier.issnl0020-1383-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats