File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.5465/amj.2014.0205
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84959278785
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Protecting market identity: When and how do organizations respond to consumers' devaluations?
| Title | Protecting market identity: When and how do organizations respond to consumers' devaluations? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2016 |
| Citation | Academy of Management Journal, 2016, v. 59, n. 1, p. 135-162 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This article examines the conditions under which organizations publicly respond to unfavorable consumer evaluations that challenge their market identity. Because organizations' market identities are certified by expert evaluations, consumers' devaluations that challenge these expert evaluations represent an identity threat. However, organizations do not always react to consumers' devaluations because of the risks associated with public responses. Hence, we first predict that organizations are more likely to respond to severe devaluations than to weaker ones; second, we propose that organizations, when faced with severe devaluations, are more likely to craft responses that justify their actions and behaviors. We further contend that, for any market identity under consideration, an organization's reputation amplifies these relationships. Analyses of a dataset of London hoteliers' responses to online reviews posted on TripAdvisor during the period 2002-2012 lend substantial support to our hypotheses. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365263 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 9.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 8.271 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Tao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wezel, Filippo Carlo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Forgues, Bernard | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-04T06:55:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-04T06:55:21Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Academy of Management Journal, 2016, v. 59, n. 1, p. 135-162 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0001-4273 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365263 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This article examines the conditions under which organizations publicly respond to unfavorable consumer evaluations that challenge their market identity. Because organizations' market identities are certified by expert evaluations, consumers' devaluations that challenge these expert evaluations represent an identity threat. However, organizations do not always react to consumers' devaluations because of the risks associated with public responses. Hence, we first predict that organizations are more likely to respond to severe devaluations than to weaker ones; second, we propose that organizations, when faced with severe devaluations, are more likely to craft responses that justify their actions and behaviors. We further contend that, for any market identity under consideration, an organization's reputation amplifies these relationships. Analyses of a dataset of London hoteliers' responses to online reviews posted on TripAdvisor during the period 2002-2012 lend substantial support to our hypotheses. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Academy of Management Journal | - |
| dc.title | Protecting market identity: When and how do organizations respond to consumers' devaluations? | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5465/amj.2014.0205 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84959278785 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 59 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 135 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 162 | - |
