File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000031012
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-82455253750
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Identity repositioning: The case of Liberal Democrats and audience attention in British politics, 1950-2005
| Title | Identity repositioning: The case of Liberal Democrats and audience attention in British politics, 1950-2005 |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2010 |
| Citation | Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 2010, v. 31, p. 295-320 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Empirical research demonstrates that category specialism is aligned with competitive success and that social actors indulging in perceptual violations of social codes are subjected to devaluations. Through category generalism, however, social actors may obtain access to diverse set of audience segments. This chapter investigates such a trade-off in the context of political ideologies - conceived here as composed of social codes and exposed to a discipline similar to that of market categories. A successful instance of repositioned identity is introduced and discussed: the case of the British Liberal Democrats Party during the post-WWII period. Particular attention is dedicated to the process of recombination of own and oppositional social codes. This strategy contributed to increase the audience attention received on each of the issues traditionally "owned" by the Liberal Democrats Party. Party level analyses suggest that the borrowed issues improved audience attention when they contributed to extend and clarify the ideological roots of the Liberal Party. The implications of this case study for current research on market categories are further discussed. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365285 |
| ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.459 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Karthikeyan, Soorjith Illickal | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wezel, Filippo Carlo | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-04T06:55:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-04T06:55:28Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 2010, v. 31, p. 295-320 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0733-558X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365285 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Empirical research demonstrates that category specialism is aligned with competitive success and that social actors indulging in perceptual violations of social codes are subjected to devaluations. Through category generalism, however, social actors may obtain access to diverse set of audience segments. This chapter investigates such a trade-off in the context of political ideologies - conceived here as composed of social codes and exposed to a discipline similar to that of market categories. A successful instance of repositioned identity is introduced and discussed: the case of the British Liberal Democrats Party during the post-WWII period. Particular attention is dedicated to the process of recombination of own and oppositional social codes. This strategy contributed to increase the audience attention received on each of the issues traditionally "owned" by the Liberal Democrats Party. Party level analyses suggest that the borrowed issues improved audience attention when they contributed to extend and clarify the ideological roots of the Liberal Party. The implications of this case study for current research on market categories are further discussed. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Research in the Sociology of Organizations | - |
| dc.title | Identity repositioning: The case of Liberal Democrats and audience attention in British politics, 1950-2005 | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000031012 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-82455253750 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 31 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 295 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 320 | - |
