File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1163/25427466-00502002
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85117277187
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Cage for the Birds: On the Social Transformation of Chinese Law, 1999-2019
| Title | Cage for the Birds: On the Social Transformation of Chinese Law, 1999-2019 |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Chinese law Chinese society corruption social control stability |
| Issue Date | 19-Apr-2021 |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Citation | China law and society review, 2021, v. 5, n. 2, p. 66-87 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | In his book on legal reform in China after Mao, Stanley B. Lubman adopted the metaphor “bird in a cage” to describe the status of Chinese law at the turn of the twenty-first century. This article offers some general reflections on the social transformation of Chinese law since 1999, with the objective of explaining (1) how the legal bird has become a cage, and (2) how this new legal cage has been used to trap birds in Chinese society. It first traces the transformation of the legal bird into a cage in China’s reform era and then tells the stories of four species of birds currently confined in the legal cage, namely, hawks (state officials), crows (rights activists), sparrows (netizens), and ostriches (ordinary citizens). Laws related to the four species are concerned with combating corruption, political stability, internet control, and everyday life, respectively. By focusing on the four species of birds in the legal cage, this article offers a fresh understanding of how law interacts with various individuals and social groups in Chinese society and a sociolegal explanation of the social transformation of China’s legal system from 1999 to 2019. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365839 |
| ISSN |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Liu, S | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-12T00:35:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-12T00:35:58Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-19 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | China law and society review, 2021, v. 5, n. 2, p. 66-87 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2542-7458 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365839 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>In his book on legal reform in China after Mao, Stanley B. Lubman adopted the metaphor “bird in a cage” to describe the status of Chinese law at the turn of the twenty-first century. This article offers some general reflections on the social transformation of Chinese law since 1999, with the objective of explaining (1) how the legal bird has become a cage, and (2) how this new legal cage has been used to trap birds in Chinese society. It first traces the transformation of the legal bird into a cage in China’s reform era and then tells the stories of four species of birds currently confined in the legal cage, namely, hawks (state officials), crows (rights activists), sparrows (netizens), and ostriches (ordinary citizens). Laws related to the four species are concerned with combating corruption, political stability, internet control, and everyday life, respectively. By focusing on the four species of birds in the legal cage, this article offers a fresh understanding of how law interacts with various individuals and social groups in Chinese society and a sociolegal explanation of the social transformation of China’s legal system from 1999 to 2019.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Brill | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | China law and society review | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Chinese law | - |
| dc.subject | Chinese society | - |
| dc.subject | corruption | - |
| dc.subject | social control | - |
| dc.subject | stability | - |
| dc.title | Cage for the Birds: On the Social Transformation of Chinese Law, 1999-2019 | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1163/25427466-00502002 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85117277187 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 5 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 66 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 87 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2542-7466 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 2542-7458 | - |
