File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Refining Sampling Efforts for Fish Diversity Assessment in Subtropical Urban Estuarine and Oceanic Waters Using Environmental DNA With Multiple Primers

TitleRefining Sampling Efforts for Fish Diversity Assessment in Subtropical Urban Estuarine and Oceanic Waters Using Environmental DNA With Multiple Primers
Authors
Keywordsbiodiversity
eDNA
fish
sampling effort
subtropical estuary
Issue Date1-Sep-2024
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
Citation
Environmental DNA, 2024, v. 6, n. 5 How to Cite?
AbstractThe environmental DNA (eDNA) approach is an emerging tool for monitoring marine biodiversity. However, the sampling effort needs optimization according to the site characteristics and target taxonomic groups. In this study, we optimized the eDNA sampling effort in terms of sample volume and number of replicates to monitor the diversity of marine vertebrates (mainly fish) in Hong Kong's subtropical waters that show a gradient of estuarine to oceanic waters. To maximize detection, we used three pairs of metabarcoding primers (12S-v5, MiFish-U, and MiFish-E). We compared vertebrate diversity in 78 water samples, ranging from 1 to 10 L, collected from oceanic and estuarine sites. Metabarcoding yielded a total of 140 vertebrate species, of which 18 were unique to the estuarine site, 66 unique to the oceanic site, and 56 shared between both sites. The detected species were predominantly ray-finned fish (136 species), and the three primer pairs exhibited differential sensitivity toward different taxa, especially cartilaginous fish and cetaceans. Increasing sampling volume per replicate generally increased the total detected species, average species per replicate, and species coverage, and sampling 3 or 4 × 4 L represented the most efficient sampling effort for the estuarine and oceanic sites, respectively. The diversity analysis revealed that sampling >2 L per replicate reduced variability and improved diversity analysis. The results also showed that a larger sampling volume per replicate increased the probability of detecting endangered, indicator, invasive, and elusive species, with 4 L representing the most efficient volume. This study recommended sampling 4 L per replicate and 3 replicates for estuarine and 4 for oceanic sites, respectively for effectively monitoring marine fish in subtropical waters using the eDNA approach.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366298

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHow, Chun Ming-
dc.contributor.authorIp, Jack Chi Ho-
dc.contributor.authorDeconinck, Dumas-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Meihong-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Meng-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Jinping-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Kenneth Mei Yee-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Leo Lai-
dc.contributor.authorQiu, Jian Wen-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T04:18:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-25T04:18:37Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental DNA, 2024, v. 6, n. 5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366298-
dc.description.abstractThe environmental DNA (eDNA) approach is an emerging tool for monitoring marine biodiversity. However, the sampling effort needs optimization according to the site characteristics and target taxonomic groups. In this study, we optimized the eDNA sampling effort in terms of sample volume and number of replicates to monitor the diversity of marine vertebrates (mainly fish) in Hong Kong's subtropical waters that show a gradient of estuarine to oceanic waters. To maximize detection, we used three pairs of metabarcoding primers (12S-v5, MiFish-U, and MiFish-E). We compared vertebrate diversity in 78 water samples, ranging from 1 to 10 L, collected from oceanic and estuarine sites. Metabarcoding yielded a total of 140 vertebrate species, of which 18 were unique to the estuarine site, 66 unique to the oceanic site, and 56 shared between both sites. The detected species were predominantly ray-finned fish (136 species), and the three primer pairs exhibited differential sensitivity toward different taxa, especially cartilaginous fish and cetaceans. Increasing sampling volume per replicate generally increased the total detected species, average species per replicate, and species coverage, and sampling 3 or 4 × 4 L represented the most efficient sampling effort for the estuarine and oceanic sites, respectively. The diversity analysis revealed that sampling >2 L per replicate reduced variability and improved diversity analysis. The results also showed that a larger sampling volume per replicate increased the probability of detecting endangered, indicator, invasive, and elusive species, with 4 L representing the most efficient volume. This study recommended sampling 4 L per replicate and 3 replicates for estuarine and 4 for oceanic sites, respectively for effectively monitoring marine fish in subtropical waters using the eDNA approach.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental DNA-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbiodiversity-
dc.subjecteDNA-
dc.subjectfish-
dc.subjectsampling effort-
dc.subjectsubtropical estuary-
dc.titleRefining Sampling Efforts for Fish Diversity Assessment in Subtropical Urban Estuarine and Oceanic Waters Using Environmental DNA With Multiple Primers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/edn3.70013-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85204586020-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.eissn2637-4943-
dc.identifier.issnl2637-4943-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats