File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Co-Developing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Guidelines in Hong Kong: An Example of a Mental Health Literacy Promotion Project

TitleCo-Developing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Guidelines in Hong Kong: An Example of a Mental Health Literacy Promotion Project
Authors
Issue Date1-Aug-2025
PublisherSAGE Publications
Citation
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2025, v. 24 How to Cite?
Abstract

Although community-based participatory research (CBPR) is context and cultural-specific, existing CBPR guidelines were developed in the West and may not be suitable for East Asian contexts given different cultural backgrounds. Moreover, most CBPR mental health literacy promotion projects have been conducted in the West, with limited examples in East Asia. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to co-develop CBPR guidelines with stakeholders in Hong Kong and to illustrate this with an example of a mental health literacy promotion project. We conducted seven focus group discussions with seventeen older adults in the community and eleven social workers from partnering non-governmental organizations. Subsequently, we formed a panel with community stakeholders to co-analyze and co-interpret the data and findings. Using the grounded theory approach, we identified six guidelines pertinent to CBPR practice in East Asian communities: 1. Highlighting an ‘acceptance and openness’ mentality in CBPR training; 2. Navigating the hierarchical culture to facilitate an equal partnership; 3. Breaking the project into smaller action tasks to facilitate design and implementation; 4. Fostering collective harmony through team-building activities and informal gatherings; 5. Encouraging open discussion of mental health; 6. Leveraging informal networks in mental health literacy promotion. Our discussion focuses on the methodological insights of practicing CBPR in Hong Kong and its implications in East Asian communities, along with the cultural differences compared to the West.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366512
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.898

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYau, Jessie Ho-Yin-
dc.contributor.authorKanagawa, Hotinpo Sky-
dc.contributor.authorFor, Wing-Yin-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Maggie Wai-Shan-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Stella Lai-Kuen-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Ken Tsz-Kin-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Alta Sze-Ki-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Frankie Ho-Yin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Donald Chak-Ling-
dc.contributor.authorSui, Isaac Long-Ching-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Tianyin-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Gloria Hoi-Yan-
dc.contributor.authorChui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan-
dc.contributor.authorLum, Terry Yat-Sang-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T04:19:49Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-25T04:19:49Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2025, v. 24-
dc.identifier.issn1609-4069-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366512-
dc.description.abstract<p>Although community-based participatory research (CBPR) is context and cultural-specific, existing CBPR guidelines were developed in the West and may not be suitable for East Asian contexts given different cultural backgrounds. Moreover, most CBPR mental health literacy promotion projects have been conducted in the West, with limited examples in East Asia. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to co-develop CBPR guidelines with stakeholders in Hong Kong and to illustrate this with an example of a mental health literacy promotion project. We conducted seven focus group discussions with seventeen older adults in the community and eleven social workers from partnering non-governmental organizations. Subsequently, we formed a panel with community stakeholders to co-analyze and co-interpret the data and findings. Using the grounded theory approach, we identified six guidelines pertinent to CBPR practice in East Asian communities: 1. Highlighting an ‘acceptance and openness’ mentality in CBPR training; 2. Navigating the hierarchical culture to facilitate an equal partnership; 3. Breaking the project into smaller action tasks to facilitate design and implementation; 4. Fostering collective harmony through team-building activities and informal gatherings; 5. Encouraging open discussion of mental health; 6. Leveraging informal networks in mental health literacy promotion. Our discussion focuses on the methodological insights of practicing CBPR in Hong Kong and its implications in East Asian communities, along with the cultural differences compared to the West.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleCo-Developing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Guidelines in Hong Kong: An Example of a Mental Health Literacy Promotion Project-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/16094069251362616-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.eissn1609-4069-
dc.identifier.issnl1609-4069-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats