File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/13698230.2025.2558327
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105015319430
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Political leadership and the agent-centered approach: a realist critique of Elena Ziliotti’s Meritocratic Democracy
| Title | Political leadership and the agent-centered approach: a realist critique of Elena Ziliotti’s Meritocratic Democracy |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Agent-centered approach dirty hands political leaders public spiritedness virtues |
| Issue Date | 8-Sep-2025 |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
| Citation | Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2025 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This essay focuses on Elena Ziliotti’s ‘agent-centered approach’ in her discussion of political leadership. In her view, ‘political leaders are a critical political agency.’ I advance three criticisms: one conceptual and two normative. First, it’s conceptually unclear whether her approach is ‘agent-centered.’ Second, a political leader may need to contravene instrumental virtues to uphold the virtue of public spiritedness. Third, it’s unrealistic to expect politicians to prioritize virtues when they conflict with the goal of gaining power and making a living from it. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366643 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.405 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Jin, Yutang | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-25T04:20:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-25T04:20:50Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-09-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2025 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1369-8230 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366643 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This essay focuses on Elena Ziliotti’s ‘agent-centered approach’ in her discussion of political leadership. In her view, ‘political leaders are a critical political agency.’ I advance three criticisms: one conceptual and two normative. First, it’s conceptually unclear whether her approach is ‘agent-centered.’ Second, a political leader may need to contravene instrumental virtues to uphold the virtue of public spiritedness. Third, it’s unrealistic to expect politicians to prioritize virtues when they conflict with the goal of gaining power and making a living from it. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Group | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Agent-centered approach | - |
| dc.subject | dirty hands | - |
| dc.subject | political leaders | - |
| dc.subject | public spiritedness | - |
| dc.subject | virtues | - |
| dc.title | Political leadership and the agent-centered approach: a realist critique of Elena Ziliotti’s Meritocratic Democracy | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13698230.2025.2558327 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105015319430 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1743-8772 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1369-8230 | - |
