File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Political leadership and the agent-centered approach: a realist critique of Elena Ziliotti’s Meritocratic Democracy

TitlePolitical leadership and the agent-centered approach: a realist critique of Elena Ziliotti’s Meritocratic Democracy
Authors
KeywordsAgent-centered approach
dirty hands
political leaders
public spiritedness
virtues
Issue Date8-Sep-2025
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2025 How to Cite?
AbstractThis essay focuses on Elena Ziliotti’s ‘agent-centered approach’ in her discussion of political leadership. In her view, ‘political leaders are a critical political agency.’ I advance three criticisms: one conceptual and two normative. First, it’s conceptually unclear whether her approach is ‘agent-centered.’ Second, a political leader may need to contravene instrumental virtues to uphold the virtue of public spiritedness. Third, it’s unrealistic to expect politicians to prioritize virtues when they conflict with the goal of gaining power and making a living from it.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366643
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.405

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJin, Yutang-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T04:20:50Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-25T04:20:50Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-08-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2025-
dc.identifier.issn1369-8230-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366643-
dc.description.abstractThis essay focuses on Elena Ziliotti’s ‘agent-centered approach’ in her discussion of political leadership. In her view, ‘political leaders are a critical political agency.’ I advance three criticisms: one conceptual and two normative. First, it’s conceptually unclear whether her approach is ‘agent-centered.’ Second, a political leader may need to contravene instrumental virtues to uphold the virtue of public spiritedness. Third, it’s unrealistic to expect politicians to prioritize virtues when they conflict with the goal of gaining power and making a living from it.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAgent-centered approach-
dc.subjectdirty hands-
dc.subjectpolitical leaders-
dc.subjectpublic spiritedness-
dc.subjectvirtues-
dc.titlePolitical leadership and the agent-centered approach: a realist critique of Elena Ziliotti’s Meritocratic Democracy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13698230.2025.2558327-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105015319430-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-8772-
dc.identifier.issnl1369-8230-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats