File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Resolute and Correlated Bayesians

TitleResolute and Correlated Bayesians
Authors
Keywordsaggregation
credence
pooling
Issue Date14-Aug-2025
PublisherMichigan Publishing
Citation
Philosophers' Imprint, 2025, v. 25 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper suggests a new normative approach for combining beliefs. We call it the evidence-first method. Instead of aggregating credences alone, as the prevailing approaches, we focus instead on eliciting a group’s full probability distribution on the basis of the evidence available to its members. This is an altogether different way of combining beliefs. The method has four main benefits: (1) it captures the weight, or resilience, of a group’s belief; (2) it is sensitive to correlation among its individuals; (3) it is commutative under updating; and (4) it can be seen as a generalization of weighted averaging and likelihood ratio approaches. More broadly, it encourages an overall rethinking of the belief combination problem away from aggregating bare credences and toward appropriately combining evidence.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366855

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBabic, Boris-
dc.contributor.authorGaba, Anil-
dc.contributor.authorTsetlin, Ilia-
dc.contributor.authorWinkler, Robert L.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-26T02:50:33Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-26T02:50:33Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-14-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophers' Imprint, 2025, v. 25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366855-
dc.description.abstractThis paper suggests a new normative approach for combining beliefs. We call it the evidence-first method. Instead of aggregating credences alone, as the prevailing approaches, we focus instead on eliciting a group’s full probability distribution on the basis of the evidence available to its members. This is an altogether different way of combining beliefs. The method has four main benefits: (1) it captures the weight, or resilience, of a group’s belief; (2) it is sensitive to correlation among its individuals; (3) it is commutative under updating; and (4) it can be seen as a generalization of weighted averaging and likelihood ratio approaches. More broadly, it encourages an overall rethinking of the belief combination problem away from aggregating bare credences and toward appropriately combining evidence.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMichigan Publishing-
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophers' Imprint-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectaggregation-
dc.subjectcredence-
dc.subjectpooling-
dc.titleResolute and Correlated Bayesians-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3998/phimp.3416-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105014352191-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-628X-
dc.identifier.issnl1533-628X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats