File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3998/phimp.3416
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105014352191
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Resolute and Correlated Bayesians
| Title | Resolute and Correlated Bayesians |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | aggregation credence pooling |
| Issue Date | 14-Aug-2025 |
| Publisher | Michigan Publishing |
| Citation | Philosophers' Imprint, 2025, v. 25 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This paper suggests a new normative approach for combining beliefs. We call it the evidence-first method. Instead of aggregating credences alone, as the prevailing approaches, we focus instead on eliciting a group’s full probability distribution on the basis of the evidence available to its members. This is an altogether different way of combining beliefs. The method has four main benefits: (1) it captures the weight, or resilience, of a group’s belief; (2) it is sensitive to correlation among its individuals; (3) it is commutative under updating; and (4) it can be seen as a generalization of weighted averaging and likelihood ratio approaches. More broadly, it encourages an overall rethinking of the belief combination problem away from aggregating bare credences and toward appropriately combining evidence. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366855 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Babic, Boris | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gaba, Anil | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsetlin, Ilia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Winkler, Robert L. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-26T02:50:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-26T02:50:33Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-08-14 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Philosophers' Imprint, 2025, v. 25 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366855 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper suggests a new normative approach for combining beliefs. We call it the evidence-first method. Instead of aggregating credences alone, as the prevailing approaches, we focus instead on eliciting a group’s full probability distribution on the basis of the evidence available to its members. This is an altogether different way of combining beliefs. The method has four main benefits: (1) it captures the weight, or resilience, of a group’s belief; (2) it is sensitive to correlation among its individuals; (3) it is commutative under updating; and (4) it can be seen as a generalization of weighted averaging and likelihood ratio approaches. More broadly, it encourages an overall rethinking of the belief combination problem away from aggregating bare credences and toward appropriately combining evidence. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Michigan Publishing | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophers' Imprint | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | aggregation | - |
| dc.subject | credence | - |
| dc.subject | pooling | - |
| dc.title | Resolute and Correlated Bayesians | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3998/phimp.3416 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105014352191 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 25 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1533-628X | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1533-628X | - |
