File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Evaluation of vaccine allergy safety track program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine allergy: a cost-effectiveness analysis

TitleEvaluation of vaccine allergy safety track program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine allergy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Authors
Keywordsallergy
cost-effectiveness
COVID-19
hesitancy
safety
vaccine
Issue Date1-Sep-2025
PublisherAllergy and Immunology Society of Thailand
Citation
Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 2025, v. 43, n. 3, p. 560-568 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Concerns about new COVID-19 vaccines played a key role in vaccine hesitancy and hampered population uptake. Hong Kong initiated a Vaccine Allergy Safety Track (VAS-Track) program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine-associated allergies. A ‘Hub-and-Spoke’ model of predominately non-specialists supported by the allergist hub was established to meet overwhelming demand despite limited specialists. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of VAS-Track as a pre-and post-vaccination assessment service for individuals potentially at high risk of COVID-19 vaccine-related allergy. Methods: An individual-level decision-analytical model was constructed using data from VAS-Track participants supplemented by published estimates. Analyses were from a health service provider perspective over 12 months. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Willingness-to-pay threshold was based on local GDP per capita (US$ 49,590). Sensitivity analyses examined robustness of findings. Results: Cost-effectiveness varied widely across age groups. VAS-Track was cost-saving for older adults (dominant strategy for age ≥ 50) compared with standard practice across a range of sensitivity analyses. VAS-Track was not cost-effective for younger groups (age 18-49: ICER: US$ 410,914/QALY for pre-vaccination and US$ 213,786/QALY for post-vaccination assessments). Infection rate, cost of treating severe infection, and vaccination rate were most influential on cost-effectiveness estimates. Conclusions: VAS-Track was cost-effective both as a pre-and post-vaccination assessment service for adults over 50. The ‘Hub-and-Spoke’ model using non-specialists with limited allergy specialist resources to provide vaccine allergy assessment services would provide high economic value compared with usual care for adults aged 50 and over.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/367064
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.605

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXiong, Xuechen-
dc.contributor.authorHuo, Zhaohua-
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Valerie-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Jiaxi-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Yuh Dong-
dc.contributor.authorYi, Xingnan-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Carmen S.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Philip H.-
dc.contributor.authorQuan, Jianchao-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-02T00:35:32Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-02T00:35:32Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 2025, v. 43, n. 3, p. 560-568-
dc.identifier.issn0125-877X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/367064-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Concerns about new COVID-19 vaccines played a key role in vaccine hesitancy and hampered population uptake. Hong Kong initiated a Vaccine Allergy Safety Track (VAS-Track) program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine-associated allergies. A ‘Hub-and-Spoke’ model of predominately non-specialists supported by the allergist hub was established to meet overwhelming demand despite limited specialists. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of VAS-Track as a pre-and post-vaccination assessment service for individuals potentially at high risk of COVID-19 vaccine-related allergy. Methods: An individual-level decision-analytical model was constructed using data from VAS-Track participants supplemented by published estimates. Analyses were from a health service provider perspective over 12 months. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Willingness-to-pay threshold was based on local GDP per capita (US$ 49,590). Sensitivity analyses examined robustness of findings. Results: Cost-effectiveness varied widely across age groups. VAS-Track was cost-saving for older adults (dominant strategy for age ≥ 50) compared with standard practice across a range of sensitivity analyses. VAS-Track was not cost-effective for younger groups (age 18-49: ICER: US$ 410,914/QALY for pre-vaccination and US$ 213,786/QALY for post-vaccination assessments). Infection rate, cost of treating severe infection, and vaccination rate were most influential on cost-effectiveness estimates. Conclusions: VAS-Track was cost-effective both as a pre-and post-vaccination assessment service for adults over 50. The ‘Hub-and-Spoke’ model using non-specialists with limited allergy specialist resources to provide vaccine allergy assessment services would provide high economic value compared with usual care for adults aged 50 and over.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAllergy and Immunology Society of Thailand-
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectallergy-
dc.subjectcost-effectiveness-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjecthesitancy-
dc.subjectsafety-
dc.subjectvaccine-
dc.titleEvaluation of vaccine allergy safety track program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine allergy: a cost-effectiveness analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.12932/ap-270524-1864-
dc.identifier.pmid39306735-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105020806739-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage560-
dc.identifier.epage568-
dc.identifier.issnl0125-877X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats