File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Predicting cognitive aging through brain structural covariance networks: A decade of longitudinal insights using source-based morphometry

TitlePredicting cognitive aging through brain structural covariance networks: A decade of longitudinal insights using source-based morphometry
Authors
KeywordsBrain structural networks
Cognitive aging
Longitudinal study
Source-based morphometry
Issue Date2025
Citation
Neuroimage, 2025, v. 318, article no. 121374 How to Cite?
AbstractCognitive aging presents significant challenges to public health as the global population ages. While functional connectivity changes in aging have been extensively studied, the predictive value of structural covariance networks remains understudied. This longitudinal study investigated whether baseline structural covariance networks could predict cognitive decline over a 10-year period using Source-Based Morphometry (SBM). Thirty-seven participants (23 males; mean age 54.97 ± 1.14 years) underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (T3) and cognitive assessments at baseline (T3) and follow-up (T4). SBM analysis identified twelve independent components (ICs) representing distinct structural covariance networks. After controlling for demographics and APOE genotype, IC1 strongly predicted working memory (β = -3.12, p < 0.001), while IC2 predicted global cognitive function (β = 0.37, p = 0.047). Brain-cognition relationships were significantly moderated by baseline cognitive performance, with key interactions observed for working memory and IC1 (β = 0.50, p < 0.001), executive function and IC7 (β = -0.25, p < 0.001), and processing speed and IC8 (β = 0.28, p = 0.003). Sex-specific effects emerged for IC8 in relation to verbal memory (β = 1.99, p = 0.007) and IC10 in relation to processing speed (β = 2.17, p = 0.022). APOE genotype demonstrated pronounced moderation effects between IC8 and processing speed (β = -7.68, p < 0.001) and for IC2 and global cognitive function (β = 0.37, p = 0.018). These findings demonstrate that structural covariance networks can serve as predictive markers for cognitive aging trajectories, potentially informing early intervention strategies for preserving cognitive health.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/367710
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.436

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xingsong-
dc.contributor.authorHerold, Christina J.-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Li-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Raymond C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorSchröder, Johannes-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T07:58:48Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-19T07:58:48Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroimage, 2025, v. 318, article no. 121374-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/367710-
dc.description.abstractCognitive aging presents significant challenges to public health as the global population ages. While functional connectivity changes in aging have been extensively studied, the predictive value of structural covariance networks remains understudied. This longitudinal study investigated whether baseline structural covariance networks could predict cognitive decline over a 10-year period using Source-Based Morphometry (SBM). Thirty-seven participants (23 males; mean age 54.97 ± 1.14 years) underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (T3) and cognitive assessments at baseline (T3) and follow-up (T4). SBM analysis identified twelve independent components (ICs) representing distinct structural covariance networks. After controlling for demographics and APOE genotype, IC1 strongly predicted working memory (β = -3.12, p < 0.001), while IC2 predicted global cognitive function (β = 0.37, p = 0.047). Brain-cognition relationships were significantly moderated by baseline cognitive performance, with key interactions observed for working memory and IC1 (β = 0.50, p < 0.001), executive function and IC7 (β = -0.25, p < 0.001), and processing speed and IC8 (β = 0.28, p = 0.003). Sex-specific effects emerged for IC8 in relation to verbal memory (β = 1.99, p = 0.007) and IC10 in relation to processing speed (β = 2.17, p = 0.022). APOE genotype demonstrated pronounced moderation effects between IC8 and processing speed (β = -7.68, p < 0.001) and for IC2 and global cognitive function (β = 0.37, p = 0.018). These findings demonstrate that structural covariance networks can serve as predictive markers for cognitive aging trajectories, potentially informing early intervention strategies for preserving cognitive health.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroimage-
dc.subjectBrain structural networks-
dc.subjectCognitive aging-
dc.subjectLongitudinal study-
dc.subjectSource-based morphometry-
dc.titlePredicting cognitive aging through brain structural covariance networks: A decade of longitudinal insights using source-based morphometry-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121374-
dc.identifier.pmid40675421-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105011067393-
dc.identifier.volume318-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 121374-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 121374-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-9572-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats