File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Network analysis of 18 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms suggests the importance of “Distracted” and “Fidget” as central symptoms: Invariance across age, gender, and subtype presentations

TitleNetwork analysis of 18 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms suggests the importance of “Distracted” and “Fidget” as central symptoms: Invariance across age, gender, and subtype presentations
Authors
KeywordsADHD
community
network analysis
subgroups
symptom structure
Issue Date2022
Citation
Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2022, v. 13, article no. 974283 How to Cite?
AbstractThe network theory of mental disorders conceptualizes psychiatric symptoms as networks of symptoms that causally interact with each other. Our present study aimed to explore the symptomatic structure in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using network analyses. Symptom network based on 18 items of ADHD Rating Scale-IV was evaluated in 4,033 children and adolescents with ADHD. The importance of nodes was evaluated quantitatively by examining centrality indices, including Strength, Betweenness and Closeness, as well as Predictability and Expected Influence (EI). In addition, we compared the network structure across different subgroups, as characterized by ADHD subtypes, gender and age groups to evaluate its invariance. A three-factor-community structure was identified including inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive clusters. For the centrality indices, the nodes of “Distracted” and “Fidget” showed high closeness and betweenness, and represented a bridge linking the inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive domains. “Details” and “Fidget” were the most common endorsed symptoms in inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive domains respectively. On the contrary, the “Listen” item formed a peripheral node showing weak links with all other items within the inattentive cluster, and the “Loss” item as the least central node by all measures of centrality and with low predictability value. The network structure was relatively invariant across gender, age and ADHD subtypes/presentations. The 18 items of ADHD core symptoms appear not equivalent and interchangeable. “Distracted” and “Fidget” should be considered as central, or core, symptoms for further evaluation and intervention. The network-informed differentiation of these symptoms has the potentials to refine the phenotype and reduce heterogeneity.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368087

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Lu-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yi-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Wai-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Haimei-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yufeng-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Raymond C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorQian, Qiujin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T08:01:42Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-19T08:01:42Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychiatry, 2022, v. 13, article no. 974283-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368087-
dc.description.abstractThe network theory of mental disorders conceptualizes psychiatric symptoms as networks of symptoms that causally interact with each other. Our present study aimed to explore the symptomatic structure in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using network analyses. Symptom network based on 18 items of ADHD Rating Scale-IV was evaluated in 4,033 children and adolescents with ADHD. The importance of nodes was evaluated quantitatively by examining centrality indices, including Strength, Betweenness and Closeness, as well as Predictability and Expected Influence (EI). In addition, we compared the network structure across different subgroups, as characterized by ADHD subtypes, gender and age groups to evaluate its invariance. A three-factor-community structure was identified including inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive clusters. For the centrality indices, the nodes of “Distracted” and “Fidget” showed high closeness and betweenness, and represented a bridge linking the inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive domains. “Details” and “Fidget” were the most common endorsed symptoms in inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive domains respectively. On the contrary, the “Listen” item formed a peripheral node showing weak links with all other items within the inattentive cluster, and the “Loss” item as the least central node by all measures of centrality and with low predictability value. The network structure was relatively invariant across gender, age and ADHD subtypes/presentations. The 18 items of ADHD core symptoms appear not equivalent and interchangeable. “Distracted” and “Fidget” should be considered as central, or core, symptoms for further evaluation and intervention. The network-informed differentiation of these symptoms has the potentials to refine the phenotype and reduce heterogeneity.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychiatry-
dc.subjectADHD-
dc.subjectcommunity-
dc.subjectnetwork analysis-
dc.subjectsubgroups-
dc.subjectsymptom structure-
dc.titleNetwork analysis of 18 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms suggests the importance of “Distracted” and “Fidget” as central symptoms: Invariance across age, gender, and subtype presentations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974283-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85141209586-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 974283-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 974283-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-0640-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats