File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Can Ally Work Mobilize Voice? Male Leaders' Ally Work on Women's Pro‐Group Voice

TitleCan Ally Work Mobilize Voice? Male Leaders' Ally Work on Women's Pro‐Group Voice
Authors
Keywordsally work
gender equity
hopefulness
implicit theories
pro-group voice
Issue Date31-Jul-2025
PublisherWiley
Citation
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2025 How to Cite?
Abstract

Organizations rely on members from relatively advantaged social groups to act as allies. Yet, whether these individuals' ally work enables or inhibits those from relatively disadvantaged social groups to engage in social change efforts remains unclear. We focus on male leaders' ally work and draw on intergroup relations research to theorize its consequences. We expect that the type of ally work male leaders engage in can differentially impact female employees' pro-group voice. Specifically, we expect self-focused ally work (or when male leaders critically examine themselves) to be more effective in promoting women's pro-group voice when compared to relational-focused ally work (or when male leaders focus on building supportive relationships with women). Across three studies—a field study with working female employees (Study 1) and two experiments (Studies 2 and 3)—we test this prediction and find some support that the indirect effect of male leaders' self (vs. relational) ally work is mediated by female employees' increased feelings of hopefulness. Moreover, we theorize and find full support for our prediction that the indirect effect is stronger when female employees hold fixed (vs. incremental) theory about intelligence. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368299
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.187

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDang, Carolyn T.-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Soojin-
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Aparna-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-24T00:37:22Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-24T00:37:22Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-31-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2025-
dc.identifier.issn0894-3796-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368299-
dc.description.abstract<p>Organizations rely on members from relatively advantaged social groups to act as allies. Yet, whether these individuals' ally work enables or inhibits those from relatively disadvantaged social groups to engage in social change efforts remains unclear. We focus on male leaders' ally work and draw on intergroup relations research to theorize its consequences. We expect that the type of ally work male leaders engage in can differentially impact female employees' pro-group voice. Specifically, we expect self-focused ally work (or when male leaders critically examine themselves) to be more effective in promoting women's pro-group voice when compared to relational-focused ally work (or when male leaders focus on building supportive relationships with women). Across three studies—a field study with working female employees (Study 1) and two experiments (Studies 2 and 3)—we test this prediction and find some support that the indirect effect of male leaders' self (vs. relational) ally work is mediated by female employees' increased feelings of hopefulness. Moreover, we theorize and find full support for our prediction that the indirect effect is stronger when female employees hold fixed (vs. incremental) theory about intelligence. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Organizational Behavior-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectally work-
dc.subjectgender equity-
dc.subjecthopefulness-
dc.subjectimplicit theories-
dc.subjectpro-group voice-
dc.titleCan Ally Work Mobilize Voice? Male Leaders' Ally Work on Women's Pro‐Group Voice-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/job.70007-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105012256664-
dc.identifier.eissn1099-1379-
dc.identifier.issnl0894-3796-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats