File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Nausea and Vomiting in Children with Cancer

TitleSystematic Review of the Effectiveness of Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Nausea and Vomiting in Children with Cancer
Authors
KeywordsComplementary and alternative medicine
Nausea and vomiting
Pediatric oncology
Supportive treatment
Symptom management
Issue Date1-Mar-2025
PublisherWolters Kluwer Health
Citation
Cancer Nursing, 2025, v. 48, n. 2, p. 89-98 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background Nausea and vomiting are distressing symptoms reported by pediatric oncology patients during cancer treatment. More than 40% of them experience these symptoms even after receiving antiemetics. Objective Given the limitations of pharmacological interventions, this systematic review synthesized the evidence for the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine in controlling nausea and vomiting among pediatric oncology patients. Methods Ten databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. The risk of bias of selected studies was graded using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The primary outcomes were nausea and vomiting. The secondary outcomes were intervention adherence and number of adverse events. Results Nineteen papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Sixteen studies showed high risk of bias. The tested interventions were acupuncture, acupressure, aromatherapy, hypnosis, massage, active cognitive distraction/relaxation techniques, creative arts therapy, psychoeducation, and combined massage and acupressure. Acupuncture, hypnosis, and massage interventions improved nausea and vomiting. Fifteen trials reported intervention adherence; only 7 monitored adverse events. The most common reason for dropout was refusal from patients and/or their guardians. A total of 34 adverse events were noted. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence that complementary and alternative medicine is effective, feasible, or safe in controlling nausea and vomiting among pediatric oncology patients due to high risk of bias. Implications for Practice Acupuncture, hypnosis, and massage appear to have therapeutic benefits. However, more robust studies are needed to address the identified methodological issues and determine the real value of these 3 interventions.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368623
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.767

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo, Ka Yan-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Katherine Ka Wai-
dc.contributor.authorXia, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Qi-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Sau Ying-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Godfrey Chi Fung-
dc.contributor.authorLi, William Ho Cheung-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T00:35:21Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-16T00:35:21Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-01-
dc.identifier.citationCancer Nursing, 2025, v. 48, n. 2, p. 89-98-
dc.identifier.issn0162-220X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368623-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background Nausea and vomiting are distressing symptoms reported by pediatric oncology patients during cancer treatment. More than 40% of them experience these symptoms even after receiving antiemetics. Objective Given the limitations of pharmacological interventions, this systematic review synthesized the evidence for the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine in controlling nausea and vomiting among pediatric oncology patients. Methods Ten databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. The risk of bias of selected studies was graded using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The primary outcomes were nausea and vomiting. The secondary outcomes were intervention adherence and number of adverse events. Results Nineteen papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Sixteen studies showed high risk of bias. The tested interventions were acupuncture, acupressure, aromatherapy, hypnosis, massage, active cognitive distraction/relaxation techniques, creative arts therapy, psychoeducation, and combined massage and acupressure. Acupuncture, hypnosis, and massage interventions improved nausea and vomiting. Fifteen trials reported intervention adherence; only 7 monitored adverse events. The most common reason for dropout was refusal from patients and/or their guardians. A total of 34 adverse events were noted. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence that complementary and alternative medicine is effective, feasible, or safe in controlling nausea and vomiting among pediatric oncology patients due to high risk of bias. Implications for Practice Acupuncture, hypnosis, and massage appear to have therapeutic benefits. However, more robust studies are needed to address the identified methodological issues and determine the real value of these 3 interventions.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health-
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Nursing-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectComplementary and alternative medicine-
dc.subjectNausea and vomiting-
dc.subjectPediatric oncology-
dc.subjectSupportive treatment-
dc.subjectSymptom management-
dc.titleSystematic Review of the Effectiveness of Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Nausea and Vomiting in Children with Cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/NCC.0000000000001239-
dc.identifier.pmid37026978-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85218956369-
dc.identifier.volume48-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage89-
dc.identifier.epage98-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-9804-
dc.identifier.issnl0162-220X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats