File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3389/fmed.2022.995466
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85142272724
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Disparities in the unmet mental health needs between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ populations during COVID-19 in the United States from 21 July 2021 to 9 May 2022
| Title | Disparities in the unmet mental health needs between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ populations during COVID-19 in the United States from 21 July 2021 to 9 May 2022 |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | COVID-19 disparity LGBTQ+ unmet mental health needs US |
| Issue Date | 2022 |
| Citation | Frontiers in Medicine, 2022, v. 9, article no. 995466 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: Evidence highlighted the likelihood of unmet mental health needs (UMHNs) among LGBTQ+ than non-LGBTQ+ populations during COVID-19. However, there lacks evidence to accurately answer to what extent the gap was in UMHN between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ populations. We aim to evaluate the difference in UMHN between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ during COVID-19. Methods: Cross-sectional data from Household Pulse Survey between 21 July 2021 and 9 May 2022 were analyzed. LGBTQ+ was defined based on self-reported sex at birth, gender, and sexual orientation identity. UMHN was assessed by a self-reported question. Multivariable logistic regressions generated adjusted odds ratios (AODs) of UMHN, both on overall and subgroups, controlling for a variety of socio-demographic and economic-affordability confounders. Findings: 81267 LGBTQ+ and 722638 non-LGBTQ+ were studied. The difference in UMHN between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ (as reference) varied from 4.9% (95% CI 1.2–8.7%) in Hawaii to 16.0% (95% CI 12.2–19.7%) in Utah. In multivariable models, compared with non-LGBTQ+ populations, LGBTQ+ had a higher likelihood to report UMHN (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI 2.18–2.39), with the highest likelihood identified in transgender (AOR = 3.63, 95% CI 2.97–4.39); compared with LGBTQ+ aged 65+, LGBTQ+ aged 18–25 had a higher likelihood to report UMHN (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.03–1.75); compared with White LGBTQ+ populations, Black and Hispanic LGBTQ+ had a lower likelihood to report UMHN (AOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.63–0.82; AOR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97, respectively). Interpretation: During the COVID-19, LGBTQ+ had a substantial additional risk of UMHN than non-LGBTQ+. Disparities among age groups, subtypes of LGBTQ+, and geographic variance were also identified. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/368707 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Shanquan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Yuqi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | She, Rui | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Qin, Pei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ming, Wai Kit | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-16T02:37:41Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-16T02:37:41Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Medicine, 2022, v. 9, article no. 995466 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/368707 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Evidence highlighted the likelihood of unmet mental health needs (UMHNs) among LGBTQ+ than non-LGBTQ+ populations during COVID-19. However, there lacks evidence to accurately answer to what extent the gap was in UMHN between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ populations. We aim to evaluate the difference in UMHN between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ during COVID-19. Methods: Cross-sectional data from Household Pulse Survey between 21 July 2021 and 9 May 2022 were analyzed. LGBTQ+ was defined based on self-reported sex at birth, gender, and sexual orientation identity. UMHN was assessed by a self-reported question. Multivariable logistic regressions generated adjusted odds ratios (AODs) of UMHN, both on overall and subgroups, controlling for a variety of socio-demographic and economic-affordability confounders. Findings: 81267 LGBTQ+ and 722638 non-LGBTQ+ were studied. The difference in UMHN between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ (as reference) varied from 4.9% (95% CI 1.2–8.7%) in Hawaii to 16.0% (95% CI 12.2–19.7%) in Utah. In multivariable models, compared with non-LGBTQ+ populations, LGBTQ+ had a higher likelihood to report UMHN (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI 2.18–2.39), with the highest likelihood identified in transgender (AOR = 3.63, 95% CI 2.97–4.39); compared with LGBTQ+ aged 65+, LGBTQ+ aged 18–25 had a higher likelihood to report UMHN (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.03–1.75); compared with White LGBTQ+ populations, Black and Hispanic LGBTQ+ had a lower likelihood to report UMHN (AOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.63–0.82; AOR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97, respectively). Interpretation: During the COVID-19, LGBTQ+ had a substantial additional risk of UMHN than non-LGBTQ+. Disparities among age groups, subtypes of LGBTQ+, and geographic variance were also identified. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Medicine | - |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | - |
| dc.subject | disparity | - |
| dc.subject | LGBTQ+ | - |
| dc.subject | unmet mental health needs | - |
| dc.subject | US | - |
| dc.title | Disparities in the unmet mental health needs between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ populations during COVID-19 in the United States from 21 July 2021 to 9 May 2022 | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fmed.2022.995466 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85142272724 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. 995466 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. 995466 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2296-858X | - |
