File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Impact of long-term care insurance on medical expenditure and utilization and the comparison between different pilot schemes: evidence from China

TitleImpact of long-term care insurance on medical expenditure and utilization and the comparison between different pilot schemes: evidence from China
Authors
KeywordsChina
Long-term care insurance
Medical expenditure
Medical utilization
Pilot schemes comparison
Issue Date2025
Citation
BMC Public Health, 2025, v. 25, n. 1, article no. 1379 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: This study investigates the effect of long-term care insurance (LTCI) on medical expenditure and utilization in China and compares the effects between different pilot schemes. Methods: We used four-wave data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) 2011–2018, covering 19 cities piloted by national government or local governments. We applied a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) strategy to identify the effect of LTCI. Heterogeneity tests were used to identify the effects of different pilot schemes. Results: We found that LTCI implementation significantly reduces inpatient expenditure, annual inpatient visits, and monthly outpatient visits by 13.4%, 0.033, and 0.072, respectively. The effects of LTCI become more pronounced in pilot cities with government subsidies in financing or higher reimbursement ceilings. Compared to pilot schemes covering UEBMI & URRBMI program, the schemes only covering UEBMI program could significantly reduce inpatient and outpatient frequency by 0.029 and 0.069. Pilot schemes with more service items had lower outpatient frequency (β = -0.146), and pilot schemes with fewer service items had lower inpatient expenditure and frequency (β = -0.226 and β = -0.049). Conclusion: In general, this study found that LTCI implementation could effectively reduce the expenditure and utilization of medical services. The effects of different pilot schemes vary significantly. The results of this study further supplement the existing empirical evidence on the effect of LTCI and provide important policy implications for the future development of LTCI in China and other developing countries.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368849

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYao, Yifan-
dc.contributor.authorYin, Shanshan-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Wen-
dc.contributor.authorJia, Changli-
dc.contributor.authorYao, Qiang-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Shanquan-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Junnan-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Kunhe-
dc.contributor.authorZhong, Zhengdong-
dc.contributor.authorXiong, Yingbei-
dc.contributor.authorXiang, Li-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T02:38:26Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-16T02:38:26Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health, 2025, v. 25, n. 1, article no. 1379-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368849-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study investigates the effect of long-term care insurance (LTCI) on medical expenditure and utilization in China and compares the effects between different pilot schemes. Methods: We used four-wave data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) 2011–2018, covering 19 cities piloted by national government or local governments. We applied a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) strategy to identify the effect of LTCI. Heterogeneity tests were used to identify the effects of different pilot schemes. Results: We found that LTCI implementation significantly reduces inpatient expenditure, annual inpatient visits, and monthly outpatient visits by 13.4%, 0.033, and 0.072, respectively. The effects of LTCI become more pronounced in pilot cities with government subsidies in financing or higher reimbursement ceilings. Compared to pilot schemes covering UEBMI & URRBMI program, the schemes only covering UEBMI program could significantly reduce inpatient and outpatient frequency by 0.029 and 0.069. Pilot schemes with more service items had lower outpatient frequency (β = -0.146), and pilot schemes with fewer service items had lower inpatient expenditure and frequency (β = -0.226 and β = -0.049). Conclusion: In general, this study found that LTCI implementation could effectively reduce the expenditure and utilization of medical services. The effects of different pilot schemes vary significantly. The results of this study further supplement the existing empirical evidence on the effect of LTCI and provide important policy implications for the future development of LTCI in China and other developing countries.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Health-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectLong-term care insurance-
dc.subjectMedical expenditure-
dc.subjectMedical utilization-
dc.subjectPilot schemes comparison-
dc.titleImpact of long-term care insurance on medical expenditure and utilization and the comparison between different pilot schemes: evidence from China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-025-22610-w-
dc.identifier.pmid40221674-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105002969914-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 1379-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 1379-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats