File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China’s Regional Carbon Emission Trading

TitleCarbon Abatement and Leakage in China’s Regional Carbon Emission Trading
Authors
Keywordscarbon leakage
emission trading scheme
mechanism design
outsourcing
spatial difference-in-differences
Issue Date2024
Citation
Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, v. 58, n. 40, p. 17661-17673 How to Cite?
AbstractEmission trading schemes (ETS) are increasingly becoming a popular policy instrument to balance carbon abatement and economic growth. As a globally unified carbon pricing system has not yet been established, whether regionally operated ETSs cause carbon leakage remains a major concern. Taking China’s regional pilot ETSs as a quasi-natural experiment, the study uses the spatial difference-in-differences method to examine how regional ETSs affect carbon emissions in and outside cities of policy implementation. Our analysis finds that China’s regional ETS policy contributes to a 6.1% reduction in urban CO2 emissions and a 6.6% decline in emissions intensity in regulated cities, causing carbon leakages that increase CO2 emissions in neighboring cities by 1.7% on average. Our finding further suggests that regional ETSs mitigate local CO2 emissions through outsourcing production, improving energy efficiency and decarbonizing energy structure, whereas the outsourcing of industrial production drives up CO2 emissions in adjacent cities. Moreover, the performances of regional ETSs vary largely by socioeconomic context and mechanism design. China’s regional ETSs reduce CO2 emissions more effectively in central and industrial cities but with more severe carbon leakage, while rigorous compliance mechanisms and active market trading help deepen carbon abatement and alleviate carbon leakage.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369227
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 10.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.516

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Jingjing-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Bin-
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Zhenzhong-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Xin-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Zhuoluo-
dc.contributor.authorShao, Shuai-
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Kuishuang-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Xiujie-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-22T06:15:58Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-22T06:15:58Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Technology, 2024, v. 58, n. 40, p. 17661-17673-
dc.identifier.issn0013-936X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369227-
dc.description.abstractEmission trading schemes (ETS) are increasingly becoming a popular policy instrument to balance carbon abatement and economic growth. As a globally unified carbon pricing system has not yet been established, whether regionally operated ETSs cause carbon leakage remains a major concern. Taking China’s regional pilot ETSs as a quasi-natural experiment, the study uses the spatial difference-in-differences method to examine how regional ETSs affect carbon emissions in and outside cities of policy implementation. Our analysis finds that China’s regional ETS policy contributes to a 6.1% reduction in urban CO<inf>2</inf> emissions and a 6.6% decline in emissions intensity in regulated cities, causing carbon leakages that increase CO<inf>2</inf> emissions in neighboring cities by 1.7% on average. Our finding further suggests that regional ETSs mitigate local CO<inf>2</inf> emissions through outsourcing production, improving energy efficiency and decarbonizing energy structure, whereas the outsourcing of industrial production drives up CO<inf>2</inf> emissions in adjacent cities. Moreover, the performances of regional ETSs vary largely by socioeconomic context and mechanism design. China’s regional ETSs reduce CO<inf>2</inf> emissions more effectively in central and industrial cities but with more severe carbon leakage, while rigorous compliance mechanisms and active market trading help deepen carbon abatement and alleviate carbon leakage.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Technology-
dc.subjectcarbon leakage-
dc.subjectemission trading scheme-
dc.subjectmechanism design-
dc.subjectoutsourcing-
dc.subjectspatial difference-in-differences-
dc.titleCarbon Abatement and Leakage in China’s Regional Carbon Emission Trading-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.est.4c04738-
dc.identifier.pmid39186463-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85202456999-
dc.identifier.volume58-
dc.identifier.issue40-
dc.identifier.spage17661-
dc.identifier.epage17673-
dc.identifier.eissn1520-5851-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats