File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.083
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85000702146
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Distributional effects of carbon taxation
| Title | Distributional effects of carbon taxation |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Carbon mitigation Climate change Distributional impacts Households Production sectors Subsidy |
| Issue Date | 2016 |
| Citation | Applied Energy, 2016, v. 184, p. 1123-1131 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | The carbon tax is a frequently discussed economic instrument for carbon emissions mitigation and prevention of global climate change. However, a range of issues may emerge when introducing a carbon tax; among these issues, the distributional impact has been frequently highlighted as an obstacle to the public acceptance of such a mitigation policy. This literature review focuses specifically on the distributional effects of carbon taxes and contributes to existing studies by providing a classification and discussion on how to comprehensively assess distributional impacts and what measures can be taken to mitigate the potential adverse distributional impact. We confirm that a pure carbon tax without revenue recycling in developed economies tends to be regressive, i.e. lower income households being more affected, while our research does not support the perception that it reveals progressivity in developing countries. In terms of its effects on economic sectors, we find that sectors with higher energy intensity are more affected by a uniform carbon tax, while preferential measures to protect these industries face a trade-off between environmental effectiveness and economic growth. We also stress that different designs for carbon tax mechanisms play a key role in affecting the distributional impacts and impacts in other policy arenas, indicating that trade-offs between efficiency and equity always exist when designing a carbon tax. This study may help to identify the shortcomings of existing designs and puts forward practical implications for future research; moreover, it offers valuable information to help policy-makers to understand the trade-off between equity and efficiency when designing a carbon tax. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/369289 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 10.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.820 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Qian | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hubacek, Klaus | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Feng, Kuishuang | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei, Yi Ming | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Liang, Qiao Mei | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-22T06:16:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-22T06:16:21Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Applied Energy, 2016, v. 184, p. 1123-1131 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0306-2619 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/369289 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The carbon tax is a frequently discussed economic instrument for carbon emissions mitigation and prevention of global climate change. However, a range of issues may emerge when introducing a carbon tax; among these issues, the distributional impact has been frequently highlighted as an obstacle to the public acceptance of such a mitigation policy. This literature review focuses specifically on the distributional effects of carbon taxes and contributes to existing studies by providing a classification and discussion on how to comprehensively assess distributional impacts and what measures can be taken to mitigate the potential adverse distributional impact. We confirm that a pure carbon tax without revenue recycling in developed economies tends to be regressive, i.e. lower income households being more affected, while our research does not support the perception that it reveals progressivity in developing countries. In terms of its effects on economic sectors, we find that sectors with higher energy intensity are more affected by a uniform carbon tax, while preferential measures to protect these industries face a trade-off between environmental effectiveness and economic growth. We also stress that different designs for carbon tax mechanisms play a key role in affecting the distributional impacts and impacts in other policy arenas, indicating that trade-offs between efficiency and equity always exist when designing a carbon tax. This study may help to identify the shortcomings of existing designs and puts forward practical implications for future research; moreover, it offers valuable information to help policy-makers to understand the trade-off between equity and efficiency when designing a carbon tax. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Applied Energy | - |
| dc.subject | Carbon mitigation | - |
| dc.subject | Climate change | - |
| dc.subject | Distributional impacts | - |
| dc.subject | Households | - |
| dc.subject | Production sectors | - |
| dc.subject | Subsidy | - |
| dc.title | Distributional effects of carbon taxation | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.083 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85000702146 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 184 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1123 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 1131 | - |
