File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154934
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85127465245
- PMID: 35367557
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Allocating environmental costs of China's rare earth production to global consumption
| Title | Allocating environmental costs of China's rare earth production to global consumption |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Environmental costs Environmentally extended input-output model International trade RE derivatives |
| Issue Date | 2022 |
| Citation | Science of the Total Environment, 2022, v. 831, article no. 154934 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | China provides over 80% of global rare earth (RE) that caused serious domestic environmental impacts. However, how much RE-related pollution was transferred to China along global supply chain remains poorly understood. Here we, for the first time, established the RE industry-specific input-output approaches to trace environmental costs transfer through China's RE exports from whole supply chain perspective. We found that foreign consumption contributed over half of the environmental costs from China's RE production, with a gross value increasing from $4.8 billion (65% of total environmental costs) in 2010 to $5.4 billion in 2015 (74% of total environmental costs). Countries in the East Asia (i.e., Japan and South Korea) made the largest contribution (27–37%) to the exports induced environmental costs, followed by North America (i.e., the United States, Mexico, and Canada) with a contribution of 20–27% and the rest East Asia (including countries in Asia-Pacific except China Mainland, by 16–23%). Exports induced environmental costs were mainly from RE raw materials (60%) and high value-added products (22%). Suggestions such as rationalizing RE cost as well as production- and consumption-based measures to mitigate environmental impacts were proposed to enhance RE utilities for global sustainable development. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/369377 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.998 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Tingting | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Pengfei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Peng, Kun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Feng, Kuishuang | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fang, Pei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Weiqiang | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Ning | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Peng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Jiashuo | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-22T06:17:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-22T06:17:02Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Science of the Total Environment, 2022, v. 831, article no. 154934 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0048-9697 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/369377 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | China provides over 80% of global rare earth (RE) that caused serious domestic environmental impacts. However, how much RE-related pollution was transferred to China along global supply chain remains poorly understood. Here we, for the first time, established the RE industry-specific input-output approaches to trace environmental costs transfer through China's RE exports from whole supply chain perspective. We found that foreign consumption contributed over half of the environmental costs from China's RE production, with a gross value increasing from $4.8 billion (65% of total environmental costs) in 2010 to $5.4 billion in 2015 (74% of total environmental costs). Countries in the East Asia (i.e., Japan and South Korea) made the largest contribution (27–37%) to the exports induced environmental costs, followed by North America (i.e., the United States, Mexico, and Canada) with a contribution of 20–27% and the rest East Asia (including countries in Asia-Pacific except China Mainland, by 16–23%). Exports induced environmental costs were mainly from RE raw materials (60%) and high value-added products (22%). Suggestions such as rationalizing RE cost as well as production- and consumption-based measures to mitigate environmental impacts were proposed to enhance RE utilities for global sustainable development. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Science of the Total Environment | - |
| dc.subject | Environmental costs | - |
| dc.subject | Environmentally extended input-output model | - |
| dc.subject | International trade | - |
| dc.subject | RE derivatives | - |
| dc.title | Allocating environmental costs of China's rare earth production to global consumption | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154934 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35367557 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85127465245 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 831 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. 154934 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. 154934 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-1026 | - |
