File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1266446
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85176595675
- PMID: 38029257
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Alterations in urinary microbiota composition in urolithiasis patients: insights from 16S rRNA gene sequencing
| Title | Alterations in urinary microbiota composition in urolithiasis patients: insights from 16S rRNA gene sequencing |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | 16S rRNA gene sequencing clinical correlations microbial diversity urinary microbiota urolithiasis |
| Issue Date | 2023 |
| Citation | Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2023, v. 13, article no. 1266446 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Objectives: To investigate the urinary microbiota composition in urolithiasis patients compared to healthy controls and to identify potential microbial markers and their association with clinical parameters. Methods: A total of 66 samples, comprising 45 from urolithiasis patients and 21 from healthy controls, were analyzed. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was employed to determine the microbiota composition. Various statistical and bioinformatics tools, including ANOVA, PCoA, and LEfSe, were utilized to analyze the sequencing data and identify significant differences in microbial abundance. Results: No significant demographic differences were observed between the two groups. Post-quality control, clean tags ranged from 60,979 to 68,736. Significant differences in α-diversity were observed between the two groups. β-diversity analysis revealed distinct clustering of the urinary microbiota in urolithiasis patients and controls. Notably, Ruminococcaceae was predominant in urolithiasis samples, while Proteobacteria was more prevalent in healthy samples. Lactobacillus was significantly overrepresented in samples from healthy females. Conclusion: The urinary microbiota composition in urolithiasis patients is distinct from that of healthy controls. Specific microbial taxa, such as Ruminococcaceae and Proteobacteria, could serve as potential biomarkers for urolithiasis. The findings pave the way for further exploration of the role of microbiota in urolithiasis and the development of microbiome-based therapeutic strategies. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/369517 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Liu, Haoran | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hu, Qingqing | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yan, Qunsheng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hao, Zongyao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Liang, Chaozhao | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-27T09:15:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-27T09:15:32Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2023, v. 13, article no. 1266446 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/369517 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To investigate the urinary microbiota composition in urolithiasis patients compared to healthy controls and to identify potential microbial markers and their association with clinical parameters. Methods: A total of 66 samples, comprising 45 from urolithiasis patients and 21 from healthy controls, were analyzed. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was employed to determine the microbiota composition. Various statistical and bioinformatics tools, including ANOVA, PCoA, and LEfSe, were utilized to analyze the sequencing data and identify significant differences in microbial abundance. Results: No significant demographic differences were observed between the two groups. Post-quality control, clean tags ranged from 60,979 to 68,736. Significant differences in α-diversity were observed between the two groups. β-diversity analysis revealed distinct clustering of the urinary microbiota in urolithiasis patients and controls. Notably, Ruminococcaceae was predominant in urolithiasis samples, while Proteobacteria was more prevalent in healthy samples. Lactobacillus was significantly overrepresented in samples from healthy females. Conclusion: The urinary microbiota composition in urolithiasis patients is distinct from that of healthy controls. Specific microbial taxa, such as Ruminococcaceae and Proteobacteria, could serve as potential biomarkers for urolithiasis. The findings pave the way for further exploration of the role of microbiota in urolithiasis and the development of microbiome-based therapeutic strategies. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | - |
| dc.subject | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | - |
| dc.subject | clinical correlations | - |
| dc.subject | microbial diversity | - |
| dc.subject | urinary microbiota | - |
| dc.subject | urolithiasis | - |
| dc.title | Alterations in urinary microbiota composition in urolithiasis patients: insights from 16S rRNA gene sequencing | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1266446 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 38029257 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85176595675 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 13 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. 1266446 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. 1266446 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2235-2988 | - |
