File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00784-025-06551-7
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105018527841
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Efficacy of sealants with surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) in retention, fissure penetration and occlusal caries Inhibition
| Title | Efficacy of sealants with surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) in retention, fissure penetration and occlusal caries Inhibition |
|---|---|
| Other Titles | Short title: efficacy of S-PRG sealants |
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Caries Fissure sealant Mineral density Penetration S-PRG sealant |
| Issue Date | 13-Oct-2025 |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Citation | Clinical Oral Investigations, 2025, v. 29, n. 11 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | ObjectivesThis in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of different application protocols of surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) sealant on penetration ability, retention, and occlusal caries inhibition, in comparison with resin-based sealant (RBS) under simulated oral conditions. Materials and methodsEighty-four extracted human third molars were randomly assigned to five groups: S-PRG sealant applied per manufacturer’s instructions (G1), S-PRG with 37% phosphoric acid etching pretreatment (G2), S-PRG with fluoride varnish pretreatment (G3), RBS (G4), and a no-sealant control (G5). Sealant retention was assessed through visual inspection following water storage at 37 °C and thermocycling, whereas penetration depth was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Caries inhibition was evaluated via mineral density changes (ΔMDV) measured by micro-CT after 21-day pH cycling and Streptococcus mutans bacterial challenge. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis tests, Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction, Chi-square tests, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple linear regression analyses. ResultsNo statistically significant differences in sealant retention were found among the groups. RBS (G4) exhibited the highest median penetration (100%), followed by G2 (85.0%), G1 (59.5%), and G3 (44.5%), with significant differences among specific pairwise comparisons (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ΔMDV were observed in pH cycling, but bacterial testing revealed significantly lower ΔMDV in G2 and G4 compared to G3 and G5 (p ≤ 0.005). ConclusionsS-PRG sealants pretreated with phosphoric acid etching demonstrated significantly greater caries inhibition effects compared to using self-etched primer alone, and its caries prevention efficacies were comparable to that of RBS. Clinical relevanceThese in vitro findings support the use of phosphoric acid etching to enhance the performance of S-PRG sealants. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/369619 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.942 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Yeh, Steve H. C. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Abdalla, Mohamed M. A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lam, Phoebe P. Y. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yiu, Cynthia K. Y. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-29T00:35:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-29T00:35:28Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Investigations, 2025, v. 29, n. 11 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1432-6981 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/369619 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <h3>Objectives</h3><p>This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of different application protocols of surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) sealant on penetration ability, retention, and occlusal caries inhibition, in comparison with resin-based sealant (RBS) under simulated oral conditions.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Eighty-four extracted human third molars were randomly assigned to five groups: S-PRG sealant applied per manufacturer’s instructions (G1), S-PRG with 37% phosphoric acid etching pretreatment (G2), S-PRG with fluoride varnish pretreatment (G3), RBS (G4), and a no-sealant control (G5). Sealant retention was assessed through visual inspection following water storage at 37 °C and thermocycling, whereas penetration depth was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Caries inhibition was evaluated via mineral density changes (ΔMDV) measured by micro-CT after 21-day pH cycling and <em>Streptococcus mutans</em> bacterial challenge. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis tests, Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction, Chi-square tests, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple linear regression analyses.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>No statistically significant differences in sealant retention were found among the groups. RBS (G4) exhibited the highest median penetration (100%), followed by G2 (85.0%), G1 (59.5%), and G3 (44.5%), with significant differences among specific pairwise comparisons (<em>p</em> < 0.001). No significant difference in ΔMDV were observed in pH cycling, but bacterial testing revealed significantly lower ΔMDV in G2 and G4 compared to G3 and G5 (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.005).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>S-PRG sealants pretreated with phosphoric acid etching demonstrated significantly greater caries inhibition effects compared to using self-etched primer alone, and its caries prevention efficacies were comparable to that of RBS.</p><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>These in vitro findings support the use of phosphoric acid etching to enhance the performance of S-PRG sealants.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Springer | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Investigations | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Caries | - |
| dc.subject | Fissure sealant | - |
| dc.subject | Mineral density | - |
| dc.subject | Penetration | - |
| dc.subject | S-PRG sealant | - |
| dc.title | Efficacy of sealants with surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) in retention, fissure penetration and occlusal caries Inhibition | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Short title: efficacy of S-PRG sealants | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00784-025-06551-7 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105018527841 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 29 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 11 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1436-3771 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1432-6981 | - |
