File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Can TElemedicine system replace doctor consultations to Achieve non-inferior blood pressure in patients with Controlled Hypertension (TEACH)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

TitleCan TElemedicine system replace doctor consultations to Achieve non-inferior blood pressure in patients with Controlled Hypertension (TEACH)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
KeywordsBlood pressure
Chinese
Hypertension
Mobile app
Randomised controlled trial
TEACH
Telemedicine
Issue Date8-Dec-2025
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
Trials, 2026, v. 27, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background

Hypertension is the most prevalent chronic condition and is the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases, imposing enormous burdens on the healthcare system. Although telemedicine may provide improved blood pressure (BP) monitoring and control, it remains unclear whether it could replace face-to-face consultations for patients with optimal BP control. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to investigate whether participants assigned to the telemedicine group show non-inferior BP control compared to the usual care group at 12 months.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial (RCT) will involve 364 patients receiving anti-HT medications who have well-controlled BP on out-of-office BP measurements, including HBPM or ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM). Participants will be randomised to either the telemedicine (HealthCap) group or usual care (control) group (1:1). Patients in the intervention group will measure and transmit their 7-day home BP measurements (HBPM) to the physician’s office. The medications will be refilled without consultation when optimal control (<135/85 mmHg for patients without comorbidities and <130/80 mmHg for patients with comorbidities that increase cardiovascular risk) and safety questions are confirmed. Nevertheless, if any of the answers in the safety questions are positive or the HBPM mean is suboptimal, patients will have consultations as planned. Investigators will be blinded to the randomisation sequence and allocation. The primary outcome is the daytime ABPM systolic BP at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include HT treatment adherence, self-efficacy, number of visits to primary care clinics where they have clinical follow-up, health care utilisation other than general outpatient clinics (GOPCs) in both arms at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Acceptability will be assessed through interviews with the telemedicine study participants and the physician.

Discussion and significance

This trial will examine whether patients in the telemedicine group would have non-inferior BP control compared to patients in the usual care group. It has the potential to change clinical practice and have important research implications because patients with optimal BP can monitor their BP through a telemedicine system and will have fewer frequent clinical visits. This will empower primary care and allow effective and safe allocation of scarce medical resources to patients in need. Moreover, it will save patients time because of the long wait to see doctors and collect medications in GOPCs. It is also encouraging the engagement of patients in their health because they will play a proactive role in managing their chronic illnesses.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369721
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.812

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, Sze Nok-
dc.contributor.authorYip, Benjamin Hon Kei-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shuqi-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Shirley Yue Kwan-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Shuk Yun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Jessica Jinghao-
dc.contributor.authorTsui, Wendy Wing Sze-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Sum Yin-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorMihailidou, Anastasia S.-
dc.contributor.authorMcManus, Richard J.-
dc.contributor.authorSy, Jimmy-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eric Kam Pui-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-30T00:36:08Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-30T00:36:08Z-
dc.date.issued2025-12-08-
dc.identifier.citationTrials, 2026, v. 27, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369721-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background</h3><p>Hypertension is the most prevalent chronic condition and is the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases, imposing enormous burdens on the healthcare system. Although telemedicine may provide improved blood pressure (BP) monitoring and control, it remains unclear whether it could replace face-to-face consultations for patients with optimal BP control. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to investigate whether participants assigned to the telemedicine group show non-inferior BP control compared to the usual care group at 12 months.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This randomised controlled trial (RCT) will involve 364 patients receiving anti-HT medications who have well-controlled BP on out-of-office BP measurements, including HBPM or ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM). Participants will be randomised to either the telemedicine (HealthCap) group or usual care (control) group (1:1). Patients in the intervention group will measure and transmit their 7-day home BP measurements (HBPM) to the physician’s office. The medications will be refilled without consultation when optimal control (<135/85 mmHg for patients without comorbidities and <130/80 mmHg for patients with comorbidities that increase cardiovascular risk) and safety questions are confirmed. Nevertheless, if any of the answers in the safety questions are positive or the HBPM mean is suboptimal, patients will have consultations as planned. Investigators will be blinded to the randomisation sequence and allocation. The primary outcome is the daytime ABPM systolic BP at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include HT treatment adherence, self-efficacy, number of visits to primary care clinics where they have clinical follow-up, health care utilisation other than general outpatient clinics (GOPCs) in both arms at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Acceptability will be assessed through interviews with the telemedicine study participants and the physician.</p><h3>Discussion and significance</h3><p>This trial will examine whether patients in the telemedicine group would have non-inferior BP control compared to patients in the usual care group. It has the potential to change clinical practice and have important research implications because patients with optimal BP can monitor their BP through a telemedicine system and will have fewer frequent clinical visits. This will empower primary care and allow effective and safe allocation of scarce medical resources to patients in need. Moreover, it will save patients time because of the long wait to see doctors and collect medications in GOPCs. It is also encouraging the engagement of patients in their health because they will play a proactive role in managing their chronic illnesses.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofTrials-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBlood pressure-
dc.subjectChinese-
dc.subjectHypertension-
dc.subjectMobile app-
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trial-
dc.subjectTEACH-
dc.subjectTelemedicine-
dc.titleCan TElemedicine system replace doctor consultations to Achieve non-inferior blood pressure in patients with Controlled Hypertension (TEACH)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-025-09350-3-
dc.identifier.pmid41361824-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105027332163-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1745-6215-
dc.identifier.issnl1745-6215-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats