File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Book: Submission on the proposals to implement Article 23 of the Basic Law
Title | Submission on the proposals to implement Article 23 of the Basic Law |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2002 |
Publisher | Centre for Comparative and Public Law, Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong |
Abstract | The Consultation Docement provides a useful start to the debate on legislation but is quite vague in places and does not provide the actual statutory language that would be used for certain new offences. It is essential that the government release a White Paper after it considers the comments arising from this consultation exercise. Lawyers and experts in the relevant fields may be able to identify problems in the statutory language which the government would not necessarily have noticed. However, this process will be inadequate if the government does not allow an additional period of consultation on a White Paper. |
Description | Cover title. December 2002. Includes bibliographical references. |
Subject | Basic law. Constitutional law -- China National security -- Law and legislation -- China Subversive activities -- Law and legislation -- China |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/54931 |
SSRN | |
HKU Library Item ID | b2631130 |
Series/Report no. | Occasional paper |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Loper, Kelley | - |
dc.contributor.author | Petersen, Carole | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-07-03T04:10:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-07-03T04:10:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.other | ocm53290895 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/54931 | - |
dc.description | Cover title. | - |
dc.description | December 2002. | - |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references. | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Consultation Docement provides a useful start to the debate on legislation but is quite vague in places and does not provide the actual statutory language that would be used for certain new offences. It is essential that the government release a White Paper after it considers the comments arising from this consultation exercise. Lawyers and experts in the relevant fields may be able to identify problems in the statutory language which the government would not necessarily have noticed. However, this process will be inadequate if the government does not allow an additional period of consultation on a White Paper. | - |
dc.format.extent | 21 p. 30 cm. | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Centre for Comparative and Public Law, Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Submission on the proposals to implement Article 23 of the Basic Law | - |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Occasional paper | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 342.202 P48 | - |
dc.subject.lcsh | Basic law. | - |
dc.subject.lcsh | Constitutional law -- China | - |
dc.subject.lcsh | National security -- Law and legislation -- China | - |
dc.subject.lcsh | Subversive activities -- Law and legislation -- China | - |
dc.title | Submission on the proposals to implement Article 23 of the Basic Law | - |
dc.type | Book | - |
dc.identifier.hkul | b2631130 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 21 | - |
dc.identifier.ssrn | 1849444 | - |