File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part II: Transalveolar technique

TitleA systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part II: Transalveolar technique
Authors
KeywordsBiological complications
Bone augmentation
Bone grafting
Complications
Crestal approach
Dental implants
Failures
Longitudinal
Meta-analysis
Osteotome technique
Peri-implantitis
Sinus augmentation
Sinus floor elevation
Sinus grafting
Success
Survival
Issue Date2008
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE
Citation
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 2008, v. 35 SUPPL. 8, p. 241-254 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the survival rate of implants placed in sites with transalveolar sinus floor elevation. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on transalveolar sinus floor elevation, with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year after functional loading. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates/ year proportions. Results: The search provided 849 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 176 articles, resulting in 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of these studies indicated an estimated annual failure rate of 2.48% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.37-4.49%) translating to an estimated survival rate of 92.8% (95% CI): 87.4-96.0%) for implants placed in transalveolarly augmented sinuses, after 3 years in function. Furthermore, subject-based analysis revealed an estimated annual failure of 3.71% (95% CI: 1.21-11.38%), translating to 10.5% (95% CI: 3.6-28.9%) of the subjects experiencing implant loss over 3 years. Conclusion: Survival rates of implants placed in transalveolar sinus floor augmentation sites are comparable to those in non-augmented sites. This technique is predictable with a low incidence of complications during and post-operatively. © 2008 The Authors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/58028
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan, WCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorZwahlen, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorPjetursson, BEen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-31T03:22:36Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-31T03:22:36Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Clinical Periodontology, 2008, v. 35 SUPPL. 8, p. 241-254en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/58028-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the survival rate of implants placed in sites with transalveolar sinus floor elevation. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on transalveolar sinus floor elevation, with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year after functional loading. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates/ year proportions. Results: The search provided 849 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 176 articles, resulting in 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of these studies indicated an estimated annual failure rate of 2.48% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.37-4.49%) translating to an estimated survival rate of 92.8% (95% CI): 87.4-96.0%) for implants placed in transalveolarly augmented sinuses, after 3 years in function. Furthermore, subject-based analysis revealed an estimated annual failure of 3.71% (95% CI: 1.21-11.38%), translating to 10.5% (95% CI: 3.6-28.9%) of the subjects experiencing implant loss over 3 years. Conclusion: Survival rates of implants placed in transalveolar sinus floor augmentation sites are comparable to those in non-augmented sites. This technique is predictable with a low incidence of complications during and post-operatively. © 2008 The Authors.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPEen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontologyen_HK
dc.subjectBiological complications-
dc.subjectBone augmentation-
dc.subjectBone grafting-
dc.subjectComplications-
dc.subjectCrestal approach-
dc.subjectDental implants-
dc.subjectFailures-
dc.subjectLongitudinal-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectOsteotome technique-
dc.subjectPeri-implantitis-
dc.subjectSinus augmentation-
dc.subjectSinus floor elevation-
dc.subjectSinus grafting-
dc.subjectSuccess-
dc.subjectSurvival-
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Ridge Augmentation - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Implantsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Failureen_HK
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaxillary Sinus - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshOsteotomy - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshPostoperative Complicationsen_HK
dc.subject.meshProspective Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysisen_HK
dc.titleA systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part II: Transalveolar techniqueen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0303-6979&volume=35&spage=241&epage=54&date=2008&atitle=A+systematic+review+of+the+success+of+sinus+floor+elevation+and+survival+of+implants+inserted+in+combination+with+sinus+floor+elevation.+Part+II:+Transalveolar+techniqueen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01273.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid18724853-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-50249117721en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros153612en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-50249117721&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume35en_HK
dc.identifier.issueSUPPL. 8en_HK
dc.identifier.spage241en_HK
dc.identifier.epage254en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000258734000018-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTan, WC=15052310400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZwahlen, M=7004748418en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPjetursson, BE=6506841442en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0303-6979-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats