File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816067a3
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-41849105087
- PMID: 18176347
- WOS: WOS:000260662000003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Clinical implications of anterolateral thigh flap shrinkage
Title | Clinical implications of anterolateral thigh flap shrinkage |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Anterolateral thigh flap Associate factors AutoCAD Flap design Flap shrinkage Predictive model Prospective study |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.laryngoscope.com/ |
Citation | Laryngoscope, 2008, v. 118 n. 4, p. 585-588 How to Cite? |
Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anterolateral thigh flap shrinkage after elevation and to develop a predictive model for flap design. METHOD: A prospective study was conducted in a university teaching hospital. The skin islands from anterolateral thigh flaps were outlined on a transparent sheet before and after the reconstruction procedure. Dimensions of the stretched flaps were also recorded. These three outlines were scanned and the surface areas computed and compared by tracing and use of AutoCAD. Age, sex, flap dimension, and flap thickness were investigated for association with flap shrinkage. RESULTS: Forty-five anterolateral thigh flaps harvested for head and neck soft tissue reconstruction after tumor resection were studied. Flap size ranged from 4 to 14 cm in width and 8 to 22 cm in length; flap area ranged from 30.6 to 151.0 cm. On average, the flaps shrunk by 25.0% (6.2%-52.6%), a highly significant change (P < .01). Flap width and thickness correlated with the reduction in flap size. The average stretched-flap area was 10.1% (0.4%-29.4%) less than the preflap area, a significant reduction (P < .01). The difference between stretched-flap and preflap areas was independent of all variables. We developed a predictive model using a stepwise multiple linear regression method with a coefficient of determination of 0.495. CONCLUSIONS: Anterolateral thigh flaps shrink after harvesting, and flap width and thickness are significant contributing variables. These findings indicate that flap size must take shrinkage into account to ensure sufficient coverage. © The American Laryngological, Rhinological & Otological Society, Inc. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/59892 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.128 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ng, RWM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, JYW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Mok, V | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, MSC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yuen, APW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wei, WI | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-31T03:59:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-31T03:59:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Laryngoscope, 2008, v. 118 n. 4, p. 585-588 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0023-852X | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/59892 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anterolateral thigh flap shrinkage after elevation and to develop a predictive model for flap design. METHOD: A prospective study was conducted in a university teaching hospital. The skin islands from anterolateral thigh flaps were outlined on a transparent sheet before and after the reconstruction procedure. Dimensions of the stretched flaps were also recorded. These three outlines were scanned and the surface areas computed and compared by tracing and use of AutoCAD. Age, sex, flap dimension, and flap thickness were investigated for association with flap shrinkage. RESULTS: Forty-five anterolateral thigh flaps harvested for head and neck soft tissue reconstruction after tumor resection were studied. Flap size ranged from 4 to 14 cm in width and 8 to 22 cm in length; flap area ranged from 30.6 to 151.0 cm. On average, the flaps shrunk by 25.0% (6.2%-52.6%), a highly significant change (P < .01). Flap width and thickness correlated with the reduction in flap size. The average stretched-flap area was 10.1% (0.4%-29.4%) less than the preflap area, a significant reduction (P < .01). The difference between stretched-flap and preflap areas was independent of all variables. We developed a predictive model using a stepwise multiple linear regression method with a coefficient of determination of 0.495. CONCLUSIONS: Anterolateral thigh flaps shrink after harvesting, and flap width and thickness are significant contributing variables. These findings indicate that flap size must take shrinkage into account to ensure sufficient coverage. © The American Laryngological, Rhinological & Otological Society, Inc. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.laryngoscope.com/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Laryngoscope | en_HK |
dc.subject | Anterolateral thigh flap | en_HK |
dc.subject | Associate factors | en_HK |
dc.subject | AutoCAD | en_HK |
dc.subject | Flap design | en_HK |
dc.subject | Flap shrinkage | en_HK |
dc.subject | Predictive model | en_HK |
dc.subject | Prospective study | en_HK |
dc.title | Clinical implications of anterolateral thigh flap shrinkage | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, JYW: jywchan1@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Wei, WI: hrmswwi@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, JYW=rp01314 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Wei, WI=rp00323 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816067a3 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18176347 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-41849105087 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 166304 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 141512 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-41849105087&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 118 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 585 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 588 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000260662000003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, RWM=7102153861 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, JYW=27171772200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mok, V=23467468700 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Leung, MSC=23995383300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yuen, APW=7006290111 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wei, WI=7403321552 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0023-852X | - |