File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-58049217064
- PMID: 19110824
- WOS: WOS:000261785000008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection
Title | Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Laparoscopic colorectal resection Outcome |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | Edinburgh University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/journals/content.aspx?pageId=1&journalId=12163 |
Citation | Surgeon, 2008, v. 6 n. 6, p. 357-360 How to Cite? |
Abstract | It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome inpatients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial, The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies. Copyright © 4 February 2008. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/59950 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.625 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tong, DKH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Fan, JKM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Law, WL | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-05-31T04:00:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-05-31T04:00:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Surgeon, 2008, v. 6 n. 6, p. 357-360 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1479-666X | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/59950 | - |
dc.description.abstract | It has been nearly two decades since the first laparoscopic colectomy was reported. However, the wide application of the procedure in various colorectal diseases, particularly colorectal malignancy, has been slow. With the recent reports of oncological outcomes from randomised controlled trials, the oncological safety of laparoscopic colectomy has been proven and the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. The application of laparoscopic resection should not be regarded as a contraindication against management of colon cancer, but instead it appears the preferred treatment when the short-term benefits are considered. Regarding rectal cancer, the CLASICC (Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer) trial showed equal oncological outcome inpatients who underwent laparoscopic and open resection for rectal cancer in a randomised trial, The application of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer should be accepted, though cautions are still needed to scrutinise more data from high quality studies. Copyright © 4 February 2008. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Edinburgh University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/journals/content.aspx?pageId=1&journalId=12163 | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Surgeon | en_HK |
dc.subject | Laparoscopic colorectal resection | en_HK |
dc.subject | Outcome | en_HK |
dc.title | Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Law, WL: lawwl@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Law, WL=rp00436 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80008-X | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19110824 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-58049217064 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 154150 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-58049217064&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 6 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 357 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 360 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000261785000008 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tong, DKH=8670837000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fan, JKM=23484820100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Law, WL=7103147867 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1479-666X | - |