File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets

TitleFactors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets
Authors
KeywordsControlled clinical trial
Determining factors
Extraction socket
Immediate implants
Ridge dimension
Issue Date2010
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 1, p. 22-29 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To identify factors that may influence ridge alterations occurring at the buccal aspect of the extraction site following immediate implant placement. Material and methods: In 93 subjects, single-tooth implants were placed immediately into extraction sockets in the maxilla (tooth locations 15-25). A series of measurements describing the extraction site were made immediately after implant installation and at re-entry, 16 weeks later. The implant sites were stratified according to four factors: (i) implant location (anterior/posterior), (ii) cause of tooth extraction (periodontitis/non- periodontitis), (iii) thickness of the buccal bone walls (≤1/>1 mm) and (iv) the dimension of the horizontal buccal gap (≤1/>1 mm). Results: (i) The location where the implant was placed (anterior/posterior) as well as (ii) the thickness of the buccal bone crest and (iii) the size of the horizontal buccal gap significantly influenced the amount of hard tissue alteration that occurred during a 4-month period of healing. At implant sites in the premolar segment, the fill of the horizontal gap was more pronounced than in the incisor-canine segment, while the vertical crest reduction was significantly smaller. Furthermore, at sites where the buccal bone wall was thick (>1 mm) and where the horizontal gap was large (>1 mm), the degree of gap fill was substantial. Conclusions: The thickness of the buccal bone wall as well as the dimension of the horizontal gap influenced the hard tissue alterations that occur following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66213
ISSN
2020 Impact Factor: 5.977
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.407
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
AstraTech AB
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a research grant from AstraTech AB. The authors wish to acknowledge the diligent support regarding study monitoring and data management provided by Ann-Sofie Andersson and Frederik Ceder at the Astra Tech AB.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFerrus, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorCecchinato, Den_HK
dc.contributor.authorPjetursson, EBen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSanz, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorLindhe, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:44:30Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:44:30Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 1, p. 22-29en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66213-
dc.description.abstractAim: To identify factors that may influence ridge alterations occurring at the buccal aspect of the extraction site following immediate implant placement. Material and methods: In 93 subjects, single-tooth implants were placed immediately into extraction sockets in the maxilla (tooth locations 15-25). A series of measurements describing the extraction site were made immediately after implant installation and at re-entry, 16 weeks later. The implant sites were stratified according to four factors: (i) implant location (anterior/posterior), (ii) cause of tooth extraction (periodontitis/non- periodontitis), (iii) thickness of the buccal bone walls (≤1/>1 mm) and (iv) the dimension of the horizontal buccal gap (≤1/>1 mm). Results: (i) The location where the implant was placed (anterior/posterior) as well as (ii) the thickness of the buccal bone crest and (iii) the size of the horizontal buccal gap significantly influenced the amount of hard tissue alteration that occurred during a 4-month period of healing. At implant sites in the premolar segment, the fill of the horizontal gap was more pronounced than in the incisor-canine segment, while the vertical crest reduction was significantly smaller. Furthermore, at sites where the buccal bone wall was thick (>1 mm) and where the horizontal gap was large (>1 mm), the degree of gap fill was substantial. Conclusions: The thickness of the buccal bone wall as well as the dimension of the horizontal gap influenced the hard tissue alterations that occur following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_HK
dc.subjectControlled clinical trial-
dc.subjectDetermining factors-
dc.subjectExtraction socket-
dc.subjectImmediate implants-
dc.subjectRidge dimension-
dc.subject.meshAdulten_HK
dc.subject.meshAgeden_HK
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overen_HK
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - etiology - prevention & controlen_HK
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Process - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Implants, Single-Toothen_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_HK
dc.subject.meshStatistics, Nonparametricen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Extractionen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Socket - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_HK
dc.titleFactors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction socketsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0905-7161&volume=21&spage=22&epage=29&date=2010&atitle=Factors+influencing+ridge+alterations+following+immediate+implant+placement+into+extraction+socketsen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01825.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid19912273-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-72949114458en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros169091en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949114458&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume21en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage22en_HK
dc.identifier.epage29en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000272835900003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFerrus, J=8589292400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCecchinato, D=6508390388en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPjetursson, EB=35976738300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSanz, M=7201640876en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLindhe, J=7101988857en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike6422457-
dc.identifier.issnl0905-7161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats