File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-70449346220
- PMID: 19793320
- WOS: WOS:000271629000008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review
Title | Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||
Keywords | Failure Human Skeletal anchorage Survival Systematic review | ||||
Issue Date | 2009 | ||||
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | ||||
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2009, v. 20 n. 12, p. 1351-1359 How to Cite? | ||||
Abstract | Aim: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of palatal implants, Onplants®, miniplates and mini screws. Material and methods: An electronic MEDLINE search supplemented by manual searching was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies on palatal implants, Onplants ®, miniplates and miniscrews with a mean follow-up time of at least 12 weeks and of at least 10 units per modality having been examined clinically at a follow-up visit. Assessment of studies and data abstraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Reported failures of used devices were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of failure and survival proportions. Results: The search up to January 2009 provided 390 titles and 71 abstracts with full-text analysis of 34 articles, yielding 27 studies that met the inclusion criteria. In meta-analysis, the failure rate for Onplants ® was 17.2% (95% CI: 5.9-35.8%), 10.5% for palatal implants (95% CI: 6.1-18.1%), 16.4% for miniscrews (95% CI: 13.4-20.1%) and 7.3% for miniplates (95% CI: 5.4-9.9%). Miniplates and palatal implants, representing torque-resisting temporary anchorage devices (TADs), when grouped together, showed a 1.92-fold (95% CI: 1.06-2.78) lower clinical failure rate than miniscrews. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence in the literature, palatal implants and miniplates showed comparable survival rates of ≥90% over a period of at least 12 weeks, and yielded superior survival than miniscrews. Palatal implants and miniplates for temporary anchorage provide reliable absolute orthodontic anchorage. If the intended orthodontic treatment would require multiple miniscrew placement to provide adequate anchorage, the reliability of such systems is questionable. For patients who are undergoing extensive orthodontic treatment, force vectors may need to be varied or the roots of the teeth to be moved may need to slide past the anchors. In this context, palatal implants or miniplates should be the TADs of choice. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | ||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/66841 | ||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 | ||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: This study has been supported by the Clinical Research Foundation for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland. The authors acknowledge the continuous support of Prof. Odont. Riitta Suuronen, REGA Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Tampere, Finland, and Prof. Dr Timo Peltomaki, University of Zurich, School of Dental and Oral Medicine. Likewise, the stimulating encouragement of Prof. Dr Urban Hagg and Prof. A. Bakr M. Rabie, The University of Hong Kong, is highly appreciated. | ||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Schätzle, M | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Männchen, R | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Zwahlen, M | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T05:49:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T05:49:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2009, v. 20 n. 12, p. 1351-1359 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/66841 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of palatal implants, Onplants®, miniplates and mini screws. Material and methods: An electronic MEDLINE search supplemented by manual searching was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies on palatal implants, Onplants ®, miniplates and miniscrews with a mean follow-up time of at least 12 weeks and of at least 10 units per modality having been examined clinically at a follow-up visit. Assessment of studies and data abstraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Reported failures of used devices were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of failure and survival proportions. Results: The search up to January 2009 provided 390 titles and 71 abstracts with full-text analysis of 34 articles, yielding 27 studies that met the inclusion criteria. In meta-analysis, the failure rate for Onplants ® was 17.2% (95% CI: 5.9-35.8%), 10.5% for palatal implants (95% CI: 6.1-18.1%), 16.4% for miniscrews (95% CI: 13.4-20.1%) and 7.3% for miniplates (95% CI: 5.4-9.9%). Miniplates and palatal implants, representing torque-resisting temporary anchorage devices (TADs), when grouped together, showed a 1.92-fold (95% CI: 1.06-2.78) lower clinical failure rate than miniscrews. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence in the literature, palatal implants and miniplates showed comparable survival rates of ≥90% over a period of at least 12 weeks, and yielded superior survival than miniscrews. Palatal implants and miniplates for temporary anchorage provide reliable absolute orthodontic anchorage. If the intended orthodontic treatment would require multiple miniscrew placement to provide adequate anchorage, the reliability of such systems is questionable. For patients who are undergoing extensive orthodontic treatment, force vectors may need to be varied or the roots of the teeth to be moved may need to slide past the anchors. In this context, palatal implants or miniplates should be the TADs of choice. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_HK |
dc.subject | Failure | - |
dc.subject | Human | - |
dc.subject | Skeletal anchorage | - |
dc.subject | Survival | - |
dc.subject | Systematic review | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Confidence Intervals | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Prosthesis Design | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - instrumentation | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Restoration Failure | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures - instrumentation | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Poisson Distribution | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Survival Rate | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Time Factors | en_HK |
dc.title | Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0905-7161&volume=20&spage=1351&epage=1359&date=2009&atitle=Survival+and+failure+rates+of+orthodontic+temporary+anchorage+devices:+a+systematic+review | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19793320 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-70449346220 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 169068 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-70449346220&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 1351 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 1359 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000271629000008 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Schätzle, M=6602163648 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Männchen, R=6506137819 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zwahlen, M=7004748418 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 6206828 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |