File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Head-to-head comparison of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of erosive esophagitis: A meta-analysis

TitleHead-to-head comparison of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of erosive esophagitis: A meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsErosive esophagitis
H2-receptor antagonists
Meta-analysis
Proton pump inhibitors
Issue Date2005
PublisherBaishideng Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/index.htm
Citation
World Journal Of Gastroenterology, 2005, v. 11 n. 26, p. 4067-4077 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To systematically evaluate the efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors in healing erosive esophagitis (EE). Methods: A meta-analysis was performed. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to include randomized controlled head-to-head comparative trials evaluating the efficacy of H2RAs or proton pump inhibitors in healing EE. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated under a random-effects model. Results: RRs of cumulative healing rates for each comparison at 8 wk were: high dose vs standard dose H2RAs, 1.17 (95%CI, 1.02-1.33); standard dose proton pump inhibitors vs standard dose H2RAs, 1.59 (95%CI, 1.44-1.75); standard dose other proton pump inhibitors vs standard dose omeprazole, 1.06 (95%CI, 0.98-1.06). Proton pump inhibitors produced consistently greater healing rates than H2RAs of all doses across all grades of esophagitis, including patients refractory to H2RAs. Healing rates achieved with standard dose omeprazole were similar to those with other proton pump inhibitors in all grades of esophagitis. Conclusion: H2RAs are less effective for treating patients with erosive esophagitis, especially in those with severe forms of esophagitis. Standard dose proton pump inhibitors are significantly more effective than H2RAs in healing esophagitis of all grades. Proton pump inhibitors given at the recommended dose are equally effective for healing esophagitis. © 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/76264
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.063
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, WHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHuang, JQen_HK
dc.contributor.authorZheng, GFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorXia, HHXen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, WMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLam, SKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, BCYen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T07:19:22Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T07:19:22Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationWorld Journal Of Gastroenterology, 2005, v. 11 n. 26, p. 4067-4077en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1007-9327en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/76264-
dc.description.abstractAim: To systematically evaluate the efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors in healing erosive esophagitis (EE). Methods: A meta-analysis was performed. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to include randomized controlled head-to-head comparative trials evaluating the efficacy of H2RAs or proton pump inhibitors in healing EE. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated under a random-effects model. Results: RRs of cumulative healing rates for each comparison at 8 wk were: high dose vs standard dose H2RAs, 1.17 (95%CI, 1.02-1.33); standard dose proton pump inhibitors vs standard dose H2RAs, 1.59 (95%CI, 1.44-1.75); standard dose other proton pump inhibitors vs standard dose omeprazole, 1.06 (95%CI, 0.98-1.06). Proton pump inhibitors produced consistently greater healing rates than H2RAs of all doses across all grades of esophagitis, including patients refractory to H2RAs. Healing rates achieved with standard dose omeprazole were similar to those with other proton pump inhibitors in all grades of esophagitis. Conclusion: H2RAs are less effective for treating patients with erosive esophagitis, especially in those with severe forms of esophagitis. Standard dose proton pump inhibitors are significantly more effective than H2RAs in healing esophagitis of all grades. Proton pump inhibitors given at the recommended dose are equally effective for healing esophagitis. © 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherBaishideng Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/index.htmen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Gastroenterologyen_HK
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectErosive esophagitis-
dc.subjectH2-receptor antagonists-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectProton pump inhibitors-
dc.subject.meshEsophagitis - drug therapyen_HK
dc.subject.meshH(+)-K(+)-Exchanging ATPase - antagonists & inhibitorsen_HK
dc.subject.meshHistamine H2 Antagonists - therapeutic useen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshOmeprazole - therapeutic useen_HK
dc.subject.meshProton Pumps - antagonists & inhibitorsen_HK
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicen_HK
dc.subject.meshWound Healing - drug effectsen_HK
dc.titleHead-to-head comparison of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of erosive esophagitis: A meta-analysisen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1007-9327&volume=11&issue=26&spage=4067&epage=4077&date=2005&atitle=Head-to-Head+Comparison+of+H2-Receptor+Antagonists+and+Proton+Pump+Inhibitors+in+the+Treatment+of+Erosive+Esophagitis:+A+Meta-Analysisen_HK
dc.identifier.emailWong, BCY:bcywong@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityWong, BCY=rp00429en_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.4067-
dc.identifier.pmid15996033-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4502104-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-24144447271en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros110997en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-24144447271&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume11en_HK
dc.identifier.issue26en_HK
dc.identifier.spage4067en_HK
dc.identifier.epage4077en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000208317700016-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWang, WH=36072896000en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHuang, JQ=7403635051en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZheng, GF=7402224500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridXia, HHX=8757161400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, WM=7403972413en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, SK=7402279473en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, BCY=7402023340en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl1007-9327-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats