File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Familial aggregation in constipated subjects in a tertiary referral center

TitleFamilial aggregation in constipated subjects in a tertiary referral center
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherNature Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/ajg/index.html
Citation
American Journal Of Gastroenterology, 2007, v. 102 n. 1, p. 149-152 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVES: Clinical observation showed that there is family aggregation in constipated subjects, but formal data are lacking. This prompted us to conduct a formal family study in constipated subjects. METHODS: Constipated subjects (probands) were identified according to the Rome II and Chinese constipation questionnaire criteria, healthy subjects were chosen as controls. Living first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, and children) and spouses (as internal controls) from both groups were identified. The questionnaire on Rome II criteria was given to the relatives either through the index subjects or by mail. The questionnaire was received by mailing back or through the index subjects. Any nonresponders were chased. RESULTS: There were 132 probands with constipation and 114 controls. The Rome II questionnaire was sent to a total of 677 relatives of the probands and 591 of the controls. Relatives were comparable in mean age, sex distribution, family size, and marital status in the two groups. Constipation prevalence was 16.4% in probands' relatives versus 9.1% in controls' relatives, i.e., 13% in the relatives from both proband and controls. Among the constipated relatives, 6.3% versus 9.3% of the relatives were spouses of the probands and controls (P = 0.5). Subjects with more family members having constipation will have higher risk of constipation: OR 2.02, CI 1.14-3.65, P = 0.0177 for at least one family member; OR 3.99, CI 1.86-9.23, P = 0.0006 for at least two family members. CONCLUSIONS: Familial aggregation of constipation occurs, supporting a genetic or intrafamilial environment component. © 2007 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/76497
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.391
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, AOOen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHui, WMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLam, KFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Gen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYuen, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLam, SKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, BCYen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T07:21:52Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T07:21:52Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal Of Gastroenterology, 2007, v. 102 n. 1, p. 149-152en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/76497-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Clinical observation showed that there is family aggregation in constipated subjects, but formal data are lacking. This prompted us to conduct a formal family study in constipated subjects. METHODS: Constipated subjects (probands) were identified according to the Rome II and Chinese constipation questionnaire criteria, healthy subjects were chosen as controls. Living first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, and children) and spouses (as internal controls) from both groups were identified. The questionnaire on Rome II criteria was given to the relatives either through the index subjects or by mail. The questionnaire was received by mailing back or through the index subjects. Any nonresponders were chased. RESULTS: There were 132 probands with constipation and 114 controls. The Rome II questionnaire was sent to a total of 677 relatives of the probands and 591 of the controls. Relatives were comparable in mean age, sex distribution, family size, and marital status in the two groups. Constipation prevalence was 16.4% in probands' relatives versus 9.1% in controls' relatives, i.e., 13% in the relatives from both proband and controls. Among the constipated relatives, 6.3% versus 9.3% of the relatives were spouses of the probands and controls (P = 0.5). Subjects with more family members having constipation will have higher risk of constipation: OR 2.02, CI 1.14-3.65, P = 0.0177 for at least one family member; OR 3.99, CI 1.86-9.23, P = 0.0006 for at least two family members. CONCLUSIONS: Familial aggregation of constipation occurs, supporting a genetic or intrafamilial environment component. © 2007 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/ajg/index.htmlen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Gastroenterologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshCase-Control Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshChi-Square Distributionen_HK
dc.subject.meshConstipation - epidemiology - geneticsen_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshGastrointestinal Transiten_HK
dc.subject.meshGenetic Predisposition to Diseaseen_HK
dc.subject.meshHong Kong - epidemiologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_HK
dc.subject.meshPrevalenceen_HK
dc.subject.meshQuestionnairesen_HK
dc.titleFamilial aggregation in constipated subjects in a tertiary referral centeren_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0002-9270&volume=102&spage=149&epage=152&date=2007&atitle=Familial+aggregation+in+constipated+subjects+in+a+tertiary+referral+centeren_HK
dc.identifier.emailLam, KF: hrntlkf@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailYuen, MF: mfyuen@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailWong, BCY: bcywong@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLam, KF=rp00718en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYuen, MF=rp00479en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityWong, BCY=rp00429en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00886.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid17037990-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33846131525en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros129217en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33846131525&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume102en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage149en_HK
dc.identifier.epage152en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000243376500024-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, AOO=7403167965en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHui, WM=7103196477en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, KF=8948421200en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLeung, G=35964341400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYuen, MF=7102031955en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, SK=21534605100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, BCY=7402023340en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike1033265-
dc.identifier.issnl0002-9270-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats