File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a02f56
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-67649800834
- PMID: 19487941
- WOS: WOS:000267245200005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation
Title | Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Amiodarone Atrial fibrillation Digoxin Diltiazem Ventricular rate control |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ccmjournal.org |
Citation | Critical Care Medicine, 2009, v. 37 n. 7, p. 2174-2179 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, and amiodarone for acute ventricular rate (VR) control in patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) necessitating hospitalization. Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Acute emergency medical admission unit in a regional teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Patients: One hundred fifty adult patients with acute AF and rapid VR (>120 bpm). Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, or amiodarone for VR control. Measurements and Main Results: The primary end point was sustained VR control (<90 bpm) within 24 hours; the secondary end points included AF symptom improvement and length of hospitalization. At 24 hours, VR control was achieved in 119 of 150 patients (79%). The time to VR control was significantly shorter among patients in the diltiazem group (log-rank test, p < 0.0001) with the percentage of patients who achieved VR control being higher in the diltiazem group (90%) than the digoxin group (74%) and the amiodarone group (74%). The median time to VR control was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3 hours, 1-21 hours) compared with the digoxin (6 hours, 3-15 hours, p < 0.001) and amiodarone groups (7 hours, 1-18 hours, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients in the diltiazem group persistently had the lowest mean VR after the first hour of drug administration compared with the other two groups (p < 0.05). The diltiazem group had the largest reduction in AF symptom frequency score and severity score (p < 0.0001). In addition, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3.9 ± 1.6 days) compared with digoxin (4.7 ± 2.1 days, p = 0.023) and amiodarone groups (4.7 ± 2.2 days, p = 0.038). Conclusions: As compared with digoxin and amiodarone, intravenous diltiazem was safe and effective in achieving VR control to improve symptoms and to reduce hospital stay in patients with acute AF. Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/78529 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.663 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Siu, CW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, CP | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, WL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, KF | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, HF | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T07:43:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T07:43:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Critical Care Medicine, 2009, v. 37 n. 7, p. 2174-2179 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0090-3493 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/78529 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, and amiodarone for acute ventricular rate (VR) control in patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) necessitating hospitalization. Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Acute emergency medical admission unit in a regional teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Patients: One hundred fifty adult patients with acute AF and rapid VR (>120 bpm). Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, or amiodarone for VR control. Measurements and Main Results: The primary end point was sustained VR control (<90 bpm) within 24 hours; the secondary end points included AF symptom improvement and length of hospitalization. At 24 hours, VR control was achieved in 119 of 150 patients (79%). The time to VR control was significantly shorter among patients in the diltiazem group (log-rank test, p < 0.0001) with the percentage of patients who achieved VR control being higher in the diltiazem group (90%) than the digoxin group (74%) and the amiodarone group (74%). The median time to VR control was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3 hours, 1-21 hours) compared with the digoxin (6 hours, 3-15 hours, p < 0.001) and amiodarone groups (7 hours, 1-18 hours, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients in the diltiazem group persistently had the lowest mean VR after the first hour of drug administration compared with the other two groups (p < 0.05). The diltiazem group had the largest reduction in AF symptom frequency score and severity score (p < 0.0001). In addition, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3.9 ± 1.6 days) compared with digoxin (4.7 ± 2.1 days, p = 0.023) and amiodarone groups (4.7 ± 2.2 days, p = 0.038). Conclusions: As compared with digoxin and amiodarone, intravenous diltiazem was safe and effective in achieving VR control to improve symptoms and to reduce hospital stay in patients with acute AF. Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ccmjournal.org | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Critical Care Medicine | en_HK |
dc.rights | Critical Care Medicine. Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. | en_HK |
dc.subject | Amiodarone | en_HK |
dc.subject | Atrial fibrillation | en_HK |
dc.subject | Digoxin | en_HK |
dc.subject | Diltiazem | en_HK |
dc.subject | Ventricular rate control | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Amiodarone - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Atrial Fibrillation - complications - drug therapy - physiopathology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Cohort Studies | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Digoxin - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Diltiazem - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Infusions, Intravenous | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Length of Stay | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Tachycardia, Ventricular - etiology - prevention & control | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_HK |
dc.title | Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0090-3493&volume=37&issue=7&spage=2174&epage=2179&date=2009&atitle=Intravenous+diltiazem+is+superior+to+intravenous+amiodarone+or+digoxin+for+achieving+ventricular+rate+control+in+patients+with+acute+uncomplicated+atrial+fibrillation | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Siu, CW: cwdsiu@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, KF: hrntlkf@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Tse, HF: hftse@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Siu, CW=rp00534 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, KF=rp00718 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Tse, HF=rp00428 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a02f56 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19487941 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-67649800834 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 157330 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-67649800834&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 37 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 2174 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 2179 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1530-0293 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000267245200005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Siu, CW=7006550690 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, CP=7401968501 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, WL=16230746200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, KF=8948421200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tse, HF=7006070805 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0090-3493 | - |