File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60094-4
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33750721673
- PMID: 17098654
- WOS: WOS:000243223800004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Urinary retention after haemorrhoidectomy: Impact of stapled haemorrhoidectomy
Title | Urinary retention after haemorrhoidectomy: Impact of stapled haemorrhoidectomy |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Stapled haemorrhoidectomy Urine retention |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Hong Kong Branch. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/708511/description#description |
Citation | Asian Journal Of Surgery, 2006, v. 29 n. 4, p. 233-237 How to Cite? |
Abstract | OBJECTIVE: Urinary retention is a common complication following haemorrhoidectomy. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy (SH) is associated with less postoperative pain, but whethet or not this can reduce the incidence of urinary retention has not been evaluated. This study aimed to compare the incidence of urinary retention in patients treated with SH with those treated with conventional haemorrhoidectomy (CH). METHODS: Charts of patients who underwent haemorrhoidectomy between May 2000 and March 2003 were reviewed. Data on demographics of patients, operative procedures, modes of anaesthesia, postoperative hospital stay and morbidities including urinary retention were collected. Factors that might affect the incidence of urinary retention were analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: During the study period, 204 patients (100 men and 104 women; mean age, 49 years; age range, 20-82 years) underwent haemorrhoidectomy. SH was performed in 90 (44.1%) patients while the other 114 (55.9%) had CH. Seventy patients (34.3%) were operated on as day cases. One hundred and1 seventeen (57.4%) patients underwent surgery under general anaesthesia and 87 (42.6%) were operated on under spinal anaesthesia. Urinary retention occurred in 31 patients (seven with SH and 24 with CH, p = 0.009). Logistic regression showed that general anaesthesia (p = 0.044; odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-5.97) and SH (p = 0.046; OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.02-7.00) were independent factors associated with a lower incidence of urinary retention. CONCLUSION: The incidence of urinary retention following haemorrhoidectomy was 15.2%. General anaesthesia and SH were independent significant factors associated with a lower incidence of urinary retention. © 2006 Elsevier. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/83764 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.538 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chik, B | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Law, WL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, HK | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T08:44:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T08:44:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Asian Journal Of Surgery, 2006, v. 29 n. 4, p. 233-237 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1015-9584 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/83764 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: Urinary retention is a common complication following haemorrhoidectomy. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy (SH) is associated with less postoperative pain, but whethet or not this can reduce the incidence of urinary retention has not been evaluated. This study aimed to compare the incidence of urinary retention in patients treated with SH with those treated with conventional haemorrhoidectomy (CH). METHODS: Charts of patients who underwent haemorrhoidectomy between May 2000 and March 2003 were reviewed. Data on demographics of patients, operative procedures, modes of anaesthesia, postoperative hospital stay and morbidities including urinary retention were collected. Factors that might affect the incidence of urinary retention were analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: During the study period, 204 patients (100 men and 104 women; mean age, 49 years; age range, 20-82 years) underwent haemorrhoidectomy. SH was performed in 90 (44.1%) patients while the other 114 (55.9%) had CH. Seventy patients (34.3%) were operated on as day cases. One hundred and1 seventeen (57.4%) patients underwent surgery under general anaesthesia and 87 (42.6%) were operated on under spinal anaesthesia. Urinary retention occurred in 31 patients (seven with SH and 24 with CH, p = 0.009). Logistic regression showed that general anaesthesia (p = 0.044; odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-5.97) and SH (p = 0.046; OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.02-7.00) were independent factors associated with a lower incidence of urinary retention. CONCLUSION: The incidence of urinary retention following haemorrhoidectomy was 15.2%. General anaesthesia and SH were independent significant factors associated with a lower incidence of urinary retention. © 2006 Elsevier. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Hong Kong Branch. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/708511/description#description | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Asian Journal of Surgery | en_HK |
dc.subject | Stapled haemorrhoidectomy | en_HK |
dc.subject | Urine retention | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Analysis of Variance | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Hemorrhoids - surgery | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Postoperative Complications | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Surgical Staplers | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Urinary Retention - epidemiology - etiology - prevention and control | - |
dc.title | Urinary retention after haemorrhoidectomy: Impact of stapled haemorrhoidectomy | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Law, WL: lawwl@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Law, WL=rp00436 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60094-4 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17098654 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33750721673 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 126601 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33750721673&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 233 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 237 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000243223800004 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chik, B=15764573900 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Law, WL=7103147867 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Choi, HK=7404339913 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1015-9584 | - |